Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

2014 Chess Olympiad (Tromsø)


  • 3 months ago · Quote · #561

    Tralitrala

    where is the link to the live ratings of single players?

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #562

    With_every_step

    3kush3 wrote:

    Kudos to FIDE for organising such a well planned & widely broadcasted event. Congratulations to Magnus for participating and raising the profile of the tourney. Ratings are overrated anyway :)

    But Saric have higher average defendpawn!

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #563

    RomyGer

    To Tinko, post 547 and Trali, post 574, have a look at  www.chess-results.com and you will find a lot of answers to your questions !

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #564

    Tralitrala

    Thanks RomyGer..so Cramling performed on 2659 level indeed..

     

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #565

    SilentKnighte5

    India had a weak strength of schedule, their accomplishment wasn't earned.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #566

    SilentKnighte5

    Nice job Cuba. Cool

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #568

    ajmeroski

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 3 months ago · Quote · #569

    fabelhaft

    One thing that never happened before is that the winning team has a first board with a minus score. Wang Yue didn't win a single game, even in the matches against Albania and Egypt, and lost to Leko. But he drew several top players as well and performed a quite decent 2673.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #570

    starrynight14

    fabelhaft wrote:
    watcha wrote:

    It is for fact that you can't reach high rating against an opposition which is low rated on average. If you force Carlsen to play against an opposition that is on average say 2550, he will find it very difficult to maintain a rating of 2880 ( this is because he will get very few points for wins, but will lose here and there, which will we devastating for his rating ).

    It is hardly a fact, it was often said before that Carlsen's high rating was caused by his good results against "weak" opponents. In general the rating system is "fair", i.e. you get the "right" rating regardless if you play 2550s or 2750s.

    You lose more ratings points drawing or losing to players rating significantly lower than yourself.  That's why the top players cling onto being in the 'elite' circle where they get all the invites to the top tournaments.  Those who haven't broken into that circle will likely struggle to keep their rating as consistent.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #571

    MSC157

    Vallejo back into the club, so is Rapport. Kramnik despite 2 losses on +/-0.0 and remained 10th. :)

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #572

    blueemu

    Congratulations to China and Russia... and a brilliant showing by India.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #573

    DjonniDerevnja

    You lose more ratings points drawing or losing to players rating significantly lower than yourself.  That's why the top players cling onto being in the 'elite' circle where they get all the invites to the top tournaments.  Those who haven't broken into that circle will likely struggle to keep their rating as consistent.

    I think that worst case ratingdeal is to play players on the way up. Because upcoming players are underrated. Johan Salomon is an example. He is coming up, has a rating at ca 2350, but plays like 2450+. Or try Isak Sjøberg, rated at Norwegian 1249, or even worse, Isak in January rated at ca 1060. Isak may go above 1600 this year, so it is a very bad ratingdeal to meet him. He already passed 1600 in rapid, and actually is planning to get 2500 later.

    Magnus will of course beat Isak, and probably Johan too, but Johan can play draw or even win.

    The best ratingdeal is to play rusty highrated players that still has a high rating, but doesnt play as much as they used too.

    Those super-GM´s are playing a lot of tournaments and keeping themselves sharp. It is very hard work to lure some ratingpoints from them.

    The young Chinese players are coming up, they are a very bad ratingdeal.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #574

    watcha

    Among the many gratulations, let me say silently, that Hungary finished in second place, with only one defeat, suffered from the olympic champion China.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #575

    Debistro

    Two players died during this Olympiad. Chess is such a stressful game.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #576

    Racer05

    Does anyone know who took all the medals on each board? (Gold, Silver, Bronze on board 1, Gold, Silver, Bronze on board 2, etc...)

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #577

    VG_

    Racer05 wrote:

    Does anyone know who took all the medals on each board? (Gold, Silver, Bronze on board 1, Gold, Silver, Bronze on board 2, etc...)

    Everything should be here: http://chess-results.com/tnr140380.aspx?lan=-1


Back to Top

Post your reply: