9887 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Does the following series of moves represent 3 fold reptition (I am black)? Or do both players have to make the same moves three times? Finally, if it does represent 3 fold repetition, why wasnt I able to claim a draw?
Thanks in advance, Kidpoolside
Both must repeat three times.
Thanks for the clarification. That explains why this game is still going on! I am still confused though. I looked 3 fold repition up on wikipedia and they give the following example from a Fischer / Petrosian game. It is not clear to me that Petrosian is repeating the same moves at all:
In the third game of the 1971 Candidates Final Match between Bobby Fischer and Tigran Petrosian, Petrosian (with a better position) accidentally allowed the position after 30.Qe2 to be repeated three times (see diagram). Play continued:
and then Fischer wrote his next move
It's not the *moves* that need to be repeated - it's the *position*. In the example you cite, the position does indeed repeat three times. Moves 30/31 constitute and interlude where the queens dance to the kingside and then the position repeats. Moves 32/33 are an interlude where the rook shuffles over and then back to the same posistion. People often think it's the actual moves that need to be repeated, but it's not - just the position that results afterwards.
If you can click on a move in the move list, and the position on the board is exactly the same, with the same person to move, then it's an identical position.
If such a position occurs 3 times in a game, that's what constitutes 3 fold repetition.
Otherwise when a GM needed to draw to claim 1st place we'd see some nonsense along the lines of Nf3-g1-f3-g1 sometimes early the opening.
As a side note it counts whether an opponent had the option of playing a "special" move like castling or en passant. So all available moves must be identical too.
That's definitely one of the perks of living in the computer age...
thanks! very helpful!
The position is the one that repeats, not the move. It's a normal thing some people forget about three-fold repetition. Good luck in your next three-fold repetition game.
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by Superqueen500 3 minutes ago
Amazing Unsolvable Combination!!!
by WittyBlunder 3 minutes ago
Win or loss? Your choice! :)
by MSC157 4 minutes ago
8/1/2014 - Cserna-Pogats 1986
by mjm16 7 minutes ago
Bumping Old Threads
by Ziggy_Zugzwang 9 minutes ago
The Slow Slav
by hijodeluna 23 minutes ago
Why did you choose the username you have?
by Bullwhip99 29 minutes ago
French Players: Learn to embrace the Exchange Variation!
by WittyBlunder 30 minutes ago
July 2014 - Juggle with the minors
by MSC157 36 minutes ago
Nakamura, The Future World CHamp??
by Superqueen500 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!