15277 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I've undertaken what to me has become a fascinating exercise, and I'm wondering what others think.
Chess Stars has published Botvinnik's complete games (in a series edited by Khalifman). I play through 3-4 games per day. I've played through about 200. Wins, losses, draws, exhibition matches, tournament matches. Whatever's up next gets played.
It's fascinating because you see the short GM-type draws, boneheaded moves, brilliant moves, vast opening diversity, and what I've found perhaps most fascinating, development--that is, Botvinnik's development as a chess player. Although he was very, very good from a young age himself, he did develop! I confess, though, that I cheated a little bit. I skipped the first 125 games or so, mostly juvenilia, and jumped to his first appearances in major Soviet/Leningrad championships. But I'm working my way through in order now.
My process is basically to play through the game once pretty quickly. I copy out the moves from the book on my computer program, rather than downloading the games on one of the myriad sites out there that has them. After I play through a game once, I go back and look more carefully at annotations and variations. One aspect I like about the Chess Stars series is that they give suggested (or not suggested, as the case may be!) lines from previous annotators, many from Botvinnik himself. I always include the lines annotated by Botvinnik, and generally I include the lines annotated by other past figures (Alekhine, Euwe, Ragozin, Smyslov, etc.) I pick and choose which annotations look interesting to me from the series editors.
It's an interesting, somewhat long-term-ish look at a single (very great) player's chess history. I find it fascinating. It doesn't consume a huge amount of time. I probably do 3-4 games in a matter of an hour or less, depending on game-length/interest.
And the point of this exercise is ...?
To play through one of the all-time greats' games?
How come the best solver is not Super GM?
by ipcress12 3 minutes ago
Two passed pawn with Rock vs one passed pawn with Rock
by The_Ghostess_Lola 4 minutes ago
What do we do now that we are out of good FORUM TOPICS.
by Foxxy_Cleopatra 5 minutes ago
by BillPhilip 6 minutes ago
by romancitoG 7 minutes ago
Top 10 19th century players
by fabelhaft 8 minutes ago
I have News!
by blastforme 13 minutes ago
by Cobra_1878 14 minutes ago
Why do Sicilian players hate 2.c3?
by ipcress12 14 minutes ago
Best Chess Engine for analysis lines
by mooni 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!