12129 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Suppose one were to start with a game between any two Grand Masters. Any game that did not result in a draw, let us say. The game would not have to have been played here. Anyway, then get the best minds from Chess.com to determine where the game was lost. What was the first mistake made by whichever player lost? What would have been a better move?
Now go back and make this better move, say in a vote chess match between two groups of top players here on Chess.com. These two groups keep playing, with the provision that at any point, either team can take back moves, and replace them with what appear, in hindsight, to be better moves. The point of this exercise would not be to win, or to determine which group is stronger. In fact, it could even be the same group making moves for both sides. No, the goal would be to converge to the perfect game.
It would seem that this approach would have a fair chance to lead to the winning stratgegy in a two-player game with no ties. But in chess, I fear that after a while both sides might get stuck in a quagmire that ends in a draw.
Still, I ask, is it worth trying to do this? I mean, in theory, any idiot could play like a master if allowed to take moves back and replace them with better moves, right? So imagine what could be accomplished if masters were given the benefit of this flexibility.
Where is the trap ?
by RadioactiveToys a few minutes ago
Rensch and Pruess Leaving?
by Conflagration_Planet a few minutes ago
Do amateurs spend an inordinate amount of time and energy on chess?
by RG1951 6 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer vs Magnus Carlsen
by Superqueen500 7 minutes ago
How Lonnnnnnnng Untilllllllll V3???
by Conflagration_Planet 8 minutes ago
Sinquefield Cup 2014
by Superqueen500 10 minutes ago
The Evergreen Cold War Game
by Till_98 11 minutes ago
blitz/bullet rating is the only thing that matters in internet chess
by Till_98 14 minutes ago
How to hijack a repertoire?
by tygerhunter 16 minutes ago
Positional (calm) player vs tactical (sharp) one
by Dark_Falcon 21 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!