10478 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I analised this game and computer says that i made an error by scarificing my bishop. but as you see i won the game in ten? why does the copmputer so me other options and win the game in 16. surly this was aperfect game for anyone?
The link fails for some reason.
maybe it is chess.com wont let anyone else see it ?
Yes. You could post the whole game here in a reply, without the computer comments.
Anyway, the probable reason is that your bishop sacrifice was bad, because your opponent could have defended against it. That you won meant that he didn't.
Or something else, but that's most likely.
yea, just because you win a game doesn't make it well played. :D
well here is the actual game, i think it was well played the bishop was the whole plan to sacrifice,
Yes, but it wasn't a good move. Say on black's 8th move, if he hadn't played 8...d6?? (losing blunder) but instead 8...Qg5, then your attack is over and you're just a bishop down. I suspect 7...Ke8 too, I feel the king should go elsewhere but don't have time to look now.
that is very true it would have been a game where i would have maybe lost from that point. but this game he blundered and i didnt. the bishop is up for sacrifice with the kings gambit, an experianced player would have maybe played 8...Qg5.
we play to take chances and get the other to blunder, this move will panick many of the higher playes too into making blunders. i have been on the losing side of the scarifice before and it has not worked out for me. i have lost badly with low rated players too, just the luck of the game i guess. but i still consider the computer is wrong but saying my planned scarifice was a blunder.
You play Hope Chess -- you play a move hoping that your opponent won't play the best possible reply.
If you keep doing that, you will not improve much in chess strength. Trust me.
i see your point and it is true. maybe i should also see the dangers of moves and the worst situations rather then taking chances. will try to think more of the move and i now consider i was lucky to win the game.
I have had lower rated players try that against me. All I do is take the bishop and move back and relax. When you sacrifice something you have to be in the best possible position to follow up on the sacrifice and not let him have ANY breathing room.
Here is the game that that move was played against me. For winning the game in 16 moves I think I have you beat. :) No offense meant.
i see your point and it is true. maybe i should also see the dangers of moves and the worst situations rather then taking chances. THIS IS A GREAT IDEA! Start doing it all the time!
Save taking chances for bullet and blitz games when you can't be sure of your best move due to time constraints or you're just not sure of what to do.
You could try using the game explorer here to see how MASTERS play the openings and try using their lines instead of your own, at least until you opponent takes you "out of (the) book" ie known opening theory
Is it legal or not for sites to have....
by andy277 a few minutes ago
if magnus carlsen married hou yifan would the kids be gms also?
by Mottley a few minutes ago
Ebony-Going Going Gone
by ROBB_CHESS 3 minutes ago
by mapayt 4 minutes ago
need value of my set
by andy277 9 minutes ago
Can someon block game history?
by kleelof 10 minutes ago
Chess Mentor vs Tactics Trainer
by learningthemoves 12 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by akafett 14 minutes ago
winning on time....ethical. ..??
by Jimmykay 14 minutes ago
7/30/2014 - Mate in 4
by gourob 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!