11904 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If chessplaying and IQ were truly correlated, we wouldn't keep seeing this idiotic topic being posted here.
IMO, anyone can make USCF 1600 with a little sweat and a touch of O.C.D. And they can do it in 1-2 years, at most. Otherwise consider taking up bridge instead.
At most? Ouch, guess I was riding the short bus for quite a long time.
lol...well, once again we seem to have run into one of those arbitrary "The Level Which Any Reasonably Intelligent Person Can Be Expected To Achieve" statements.
I thought these questions had been settled a long time ago:
Reasonably intelligent person: 1800
Unreasonably intelligent person: 1700
Reasonably unintelligent person: 1500 (I've maxed out my talent - hurray!!)
Unreasonably unintelligent person: 1400
Although it might not be pc to admit it, yes, there certainly is a correlation between IQ and chess strength.
There is a correlation between IQ and doing anything well. This ain't exactly rocket science. And btw you're hardly likely to find anybody less PC than I am (to me that acronym still, and always, refers only to computers).
I just hope we're not talking USCF ratings...
There is a correlation between IQ and doing anything well. This ain't exactly rocket science.
**ciljettu is not a rocket scientist. Must google search jockeys**
I pretty proud of this game.
I have to say that high intelligence might lead to good chess but their analytical abilities might be extremely poor.
I guess I am unreasonable sometimes, or am I ....
Honestly trysts I'm not getting you. Could you speak in plain English?
It was a joke about you being about an inch shorter than I
IQ is a very complex term. We can not relate it with only one thing.
Yeah, I thought it was a silly statement too. I would dare to say most US tournament players don't make 1600 in "at most 2 years" In fact the average adult tourney player is under 1600 anyway, and the core of adult players has been around for quite a bit longer than 2 years.
Well, that doesn't help.
Ah, that's what I call going for the jugular.
And how do you spell it?
"Can't spell VW but I got a Porsche..."
Albert Einstein tried to play chess but was hopeless at it.
What I was going to say.
I know a woman with an IQ of two hundred and forty...but she can't change a car tyre...experts are baffled...
i think that to reach anything higher than low master, we need to have learned and gotten serious about the game in our formative years. expert is probably all i have hopes for and i've been playing for ten years. just desitined to suck.
If you can call expert sucking...
Glad to see this thread has some traction now.
Those prize tires and great lungs (from Chris2212) were outstanding.
Come on guys, any nominally intelligent person with a B.A. or B.S. degree can "teach themselves" into the USCF B Class (1600 rating), by imbibing the rather small body of knowledge it takes to get there.
Surely all the Brainiacs on this chess site could get there (eventually). But only if they're committed to systematic study, and practice. They might also need to stop playing bullet-chess, until they become stronger chess players.
Getting above USCF 2000, however, all bets are off. IQ notwithstanding.
And what do raw IQ scores have to do with it anyways? You might just as well speculate on the correlation between idiot savants and chess prowess. You'll get equally far (or not) in that discussion too.
What if you went to a live tournament and no one came except for you?
by EragonShadeslayer03 2 minutes ago
Are tactics really the way to go?
by X_PLAYER_J_X 6 minutes ago
What's the best way to become a chess prodigy as an adult?
by Elubas 7 minutes ago
Why does nobody play 1. c3?
by Ed_Seedhouse 10 minutes ago
5/28/2015 - Mate in 3
by tiantianzhao 15 minutes ago
Positional Play: What is it, really? Show us an example
by Elubas 20 minutes ago
Review: Official Staunton 1865 Ebonized and Boxwood Chess Set
by rcmacmillan 20 minutes ago
Who taught you chess? When did you first start playing?
by bb_gum234 24 minutes ago
by EscherehcsE 31 minutes ago
Wooden Chess set
by loubalch 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!