13004 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Fritz allows you to set the number of cores running - or as they call it the number of CPUs. This is dependent of course on which engine you have engaged. The basic Fritz 13 engine will only run on 1 CPU as the link shows but in fact it runs on all 4 cores on my machine, each core at 25% load. There also seems to be a limit of just over 1000 threads handled at any one time on the quad core (Core 2 Duo) Q9450, so hyperthreading would not increase chess engine efficiency - I'll eat crow on that. In comparing Houdini 1.5a 64x running 4 CPUs, that will run 4 cores at 100% load. So the Fritz 13 basic engine seems to be the same as Fritz 13 Pro, dumbed down to 25% efficiency. If you want the whole engine, you pay for what amounts to the key to unlock it.
From a practical standpoint, if I run Houdini 1.5a on "3 CPUs", I can let it run in the background and use my computer for more mundane tasks such as reading e-mail or surfing the 'net.
Hackers are able to take advantage of gpu's for brute force attacks now. I understand that what gpu's do is vector calculus. Dosen't that make them essentially math processors? Can our chess poeple please make use of this? I want more nodes for less dinero. More on topic though, the AMD FX-8150 overclocks to perform at what the AMD FX-8350 does on merely a Hyper 212 EVO (heatsink and fan). Therefore the AMD FX-8150 makes $500 chess super-computers available.
See the below links for Tom's Hardware comprehensive fritzmark benchmark (excluding dual-cpu) and also for a link to professional and competitive overclocking.
I think the basic problem is that most chess engines are written by amateurs, a few of them being commercialized. You'll usually see the programmer's name associated with any engine you find, including Houdini. The problem with off-loading calculations to the GPU is that the program must have been written to accomodate that. It isn't, as far as I know, simply a function of the CPU seeing all that GPU horsepower out there and sending the load away for faster computation. The program must be written to utilize the GPU, and not knowing what GPU is available since it varies with the system, I don't think our engines are (yet) capable of speeding up with a powerful GPU onboard.
New players and tournament brackets
by MrDamonSmith a few minutes ago
Any girls here play chess?
by MrDamonSmith 3 minutes ago
Was this exchange sacrifice sound?
by InfiniteFlash 3 minutes ago
Can users change their point status before losing?
by nen1 4 minutes ago
3/11/2014 - Too Much Attack, Not Enough Defense
by carlosmadura 8 minutes ago
BTB's Daily puzzal: Puzzal #4
by DimeSlinger 11 minutes ago
mAGNUS CARLSEN VS houdini 2 PRO
by dannygjk 14 minutes ago
submit button dissappears at end of game
by Zsofia_D 17 minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by BackTo1200OrBust 21 minutes ago
What are the official club-level time controls?
by Blade_scopezz96 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!