10487 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I can't put my finger on it, but for some reason my perception is that Kramnik and Anand are both very egotistical. I'm sure Carlsen has flashes of ego as well (as we all do) but he seems less egotistical. I think maybe it's based on watching their post-game comments. Am I way off base?
anand because he aborted the vote chess game...
None of those seem very egotistical to me.
I have to say that all of them are very humble considering their standing in the chess world!
Anand.I can't remember the exact quote, but there was one I read a while ago by him that made him come off as a bit of a douche.
None seem overtly egotistical.
Perhaps Anand comes off as the most so, of the three, but it could just be his demeanor.
To me Anand seems to be one of the most humble of all World Champions and top players, while Kramnik frequently has come around as quite pompous. When he recently stated that Carlsen's lead over everyone else on the rating list had nothing to do with chess, and that he in fact was no better than Kramnik himself or Aronian, it wasn't the first time he said that type of thing.
none of the 3 - Kasparov is capt. ego
I think Anand is the least egotistical and Carlsen is the most.
You need to see his games. He makes a smile often when the opponent makes a move, even if the opponent is 2800+ like Kramnik. doesn't matter he wins in the end through a rook sac. Also, sometimes, he looks bored which is highly egotistical. Also, when he is paired up against a woman, he looks obviously annoyed. Judith Polgar was really embarassed when he was looking here and there looking annoyed.
At lest Anand seems humble in my eyes
The best sicilian variation
by ghostofmaroczy a few minutes ago
If you could combine two chess pieces powers what would the two pieces be???????
by evertVB a few minutes ago
Best opening for white
by watcha 3 minutes ago
What is a time ratio?
by beeceedee 5 minutes ago
What could black of done better
by KING_ASSASSIN_0 7 minutes ago
If you can change a chess rule or create a chess rule, what would it be ?
by FromMuToYou 7 minutes ago
12/13/2013 - Back Rank Power
by mastermind_3 8 minutes ago
Is it agaisnt the rules so delay games?
by badger_song 8 minutes ago
anything i could have done better?
by mike_tal 10 minutes ago
12/12/2013 - Polugaevsky - Szilayi, Moscow 1960
by coencwessel 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!