11738 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I hope Anand wins but I think Carlsen will. :1
Yep, they don't owe spectators anything and are just there to win. Top level chess is typically boring anyway in the 21st century. May as well watch Houdini play against itself.
Exactly my point of view!
Romantic chess 100 years ago with sacrifices and full of small mistakes were for sure by far more interesting to watch then todays war of nerves between 2 perfect prepared players who need a team of computer specialists to find the smallest hole in the opening repertoire of the opponent..
So, any opening guesses for game 5?
I would really like to see a King's Gambit played at the grandmaster level these days.
Reti! Carlsen will find a way to get equality with this stratgically complex opening, and he will win a game with it before Thanksgiving.
Shhh! Don't tell Anand!
Anand knows if every game is drawn after the classical time controlled games, he gets a larger share of the money, than he would had he lost prior to that. I think that is as much to blame as anything. However, I don't think forcing the reigning champ to play to win, in order to be champ again, would sit well with most, but it would certainly change the way the games were played some what.
Chess will never be a spectator sport because it is just too complex. Even the drama of an armaggedon game won't be enough to TV draw crowds to watch the game live. Those games go too fast for intelligent commentary. Chess isn't camera friendly.
Yeah, certainly a lot of truth in that idea...except for true chess lovers...
KOLRAMI: Bah! (throws off the controls)
DATA: Why have you suspended the game?
KOLRAMI: Because this is not a rematch. You have made a mockery of me.
(Kolrami exits in high dudgeon)
RIKER: Data, you beat him!
DATA: No, sir. It is a stalemate.
WORF: No game of Strategema has ever gone this high.
LAFORGE: What did you do?
DATA: I simply altered my premise for playing the game.
DATA: Working under the assumption that Kolrami was attempting to win, it is reasonable to assume that he expected me to play for the same goal.
WESLEY: You didn't.
DATA: No. I was playing only for a standoff, a draw. While Kolrami was dedicated to winning, I was able to pass up obvious avenues of advancement and settle for a balance. Theoretically, I should be able to challenge him indefinitely.
PULASKI: Then you have beaten him.
DATA: It is a matter of perspective, Doctor. In the strictest sense, I did not win.
If your chess level of understanding is LOW then this championship is boring to you, but if you know or at least UNDERSTAND the subtle manuevers these GM's has to make in these games then definitly it is NOT BORING not by a long shot!
Not so boring now huh guys, seeing that Carlsen has won a game.
Loved that episode .. though this is flawed as Data is proven to not be able to "solve" the game (he loses .. which is proof enough!) but can somehow accurately "guarantee" 100% drawing play.
If Strategema is a turn based game like chess that has yet to be solved, then just like a GM cannot "100%" force a draw against a skilled opponent if he wants it, neither could Data. Maybe make it likely, but not be guaranteed one!
Which is better, Bishop or Knight?
by Conquistador a few minutes ago
Are computers really better? (argument POV)
by nartreb a few minutes ago
Magnus Carlsen: 2900
by SilentKnighte5 5 minutes ago
Dragon vs Najdorf
by Gilasaurus 6 minutes ago
Should I resign here? Or does black has resources to save the game?
by Spotlion 12 minutes ago
Quite a sort loser
by ANOK1 16 minutes ago
Can intelligent person suck at chess, forever?
by Morphysrevenges 21 minutes ago
9/4/2015 - Just In Time
by slaverobbie 25 minutes ago
by Buzzinsky 25 minutes ago
How to get good at Chess
by EliTeDavee 34 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!