10661 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
What is your ideas about ivanov ? is he a top or even a super gm ? or just he use houdini to win from top gms ?
July 11, 2013 UPDATE:
From that link at chessbase: "Suspicions were quick to follow, though Borislav had already been strip-searched before the eighth round in Zadar. Only his pen was taken away, while no material evidence of unfair play had been found."
Why do they keep repeating that crap as if he played well even after searched. The search was announced before hand, and Ivanov came to the board, passed the search (nothing found) then played like crap and lost. All the other games he played like a computer but the game after the search looked nothing like the others.
Hasn't this kind of discussion gone on before?
Edit, oh I see nimzoroy is going around bumbing all the old threads with new info.
should we report him for spamming ?
can i post my reply everywhere too? :D
[copy]the circumstantial evidence against ivanov is so overwhelming, it amazes me how some people still legitimately believe him to be legit.OMG he's a prodigy! ...yeah.
on the other hand, you gotta admit that he's the perfect man for this job - the level of asshattery required to pull this off as he's doing is impressive. his interview was amazing :D"[/copy]
okas... just this time :<
Haha. yeah I read it on the other one LYSM. I agree by the way, he had the perfect personality.
I think he kinda screwed up the end though by agreeing to tests. Why not keep up the asshattery (heh) and be all like "you guys are just jealous of my super-GM swagger"
Well, he may have been following the example of psychics, who typically agree to be "tested" but then refuse to actually participate, finding something wrong with conditions like "an aura of negativity and skepticism."
It's amazing that as frail a little twerp as he is some GM who got cheated out of a prize by him hasn't just beat him to a pulp.
Edit, oh I see nimzoroy is going around bumbing all the old threads with new info. should we report him for spamming ?
It's obvious your ingratitude knows no bounds...in the immortal words of Eric Cartman "Screw you guys I'm going home" :=)
Estragon wasn't lying about his arms!
Why I won't pay for a membership...
by DAVID_CARRUTHERS a few minutes ago
1/26/2015 - Richard Teichmann vs. NN, Berlin, 1914
by tanmay_chakrabarti 3 minutes ago
Beating people OTB is awkward
by Olympian256 8 minutes ago
1/25/2015 - Mate in 2
by LaGr77 8 minutes ago
1/24/2015 - Levitina-Marinello, 1994
Is Computer Analysis reliable?
by kleelof 8 minutes ago
"pick a side" button for team matches
by thee_black_knight 9 minutes ago
How can I report a bad player?
by kleelof 10 minutes ago
Study Plan for a 2 days
by kleelof 11 minutes ago
Analysis board take-back not working
by pseudo56 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!