14110 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
You have played more than 7 thousand games, and your bullet and standard ratings appear lower than you blitz and online ratings.
You have an (unbalanced) "dumbbell shaped" distribution to your various ratings. Maybe your reflexes are simply slowing down. It happens after about 35 years old.
But it seems odd that your standard rating would be lower than your blitz rating. Perhaps you haven't played enough standard rated games to even out your rating there. Probably just playing more Game in 10/10 or Game in 15/5, will rectify that.
IMO, Bullet makes you go blind, and frays your nerves. Why worry about it?
what the hell are you talking about? if you noticed while you were looking at the stats, I haven't played many so-called "standard games" (those should be termed rapid instead), thus the rating is not very high. if I played more I'm sure it would be between 1700-2000. also the majority of the blitz games were against the computer not people, I gained maybe a point or 2 for every win or loss, the rating stayed relatively constant even though I played thousands of 5 minute games against the computer programs.
"(unbalanced) "dumbbell (sp?) shaped" distribution to your various ratings"
what are you talking about? this is a ridiculous statement that has no relevance to anything.
reflexes? are you kidding me? what you trying to make pointing and clicking the mouse really fast sound as impressive as possible? no this isn't the case. it's just that it's a essentially a video game, street fighter with chess pieces, and I am horrible at video games, always have been, my entire life, age has no relevance. I sucked at mortal kombat when was 15 and I'm sure I still suck at it.
and whose worried?
Well, you're intitled to your opinion. It's funny to me though you think titled players are do it well because they've memorized patters. 2000 rated players have memorized many patterns too. Not as many as a professional, but not as few at a 1500, see what I mean :)
no, actually I really don't understand what you are talking about here or trying to get at, or what it has to do with anything I wrote. if a player is rated 2000 fide or uscf, they are on the cusp of being a titled player, and obviously have rapid chess pattern recognition. I group such persons in the same category as professionals and titled players. in my opinion there are two pools of players here which can't really be compared in terms of these things, chess enthusiasts/amateurs (vast majority of people) and active professional players with ratings 2000 and above.
Bullet and time goes hand in hand...Are you materialistic? Do you occassionally win a queen or a piece for that matter in the first few moves and ended up losing? It's all time. Buy a good mouse and prepare premoves.
do people actually "prepare premoves?" lol. jesus. what is this crazy bullet land?
Which is my point, it's a false dichotomy. Chess skill is a continuum not an either or.
The bold text contains simple factual statements about you 4 ratings. Do you have a problem with understanding English?
An "unbalanced barbell" distribution to your 4 ratings is exactly what I said it was. Look and your 4 ratings. Your Bullet is lower than your blitz, and your standard is lower than your online. Q.E.D.
It's a small jump to conclude you reflexes might be slowing down. Hardlly an earth shattering conclusion.
But why so combative? You asked for feedback. Yet you insist on "refuting" me (and everyone else) who doesn't agree with you.
Looking closer at the OP's record. What's now clear is that he is playing opponents way too lower rated. Roughly 300 points below him on average.
Yes, he's not very good at bullet speed. Clearly that pisses him off. Hence his railings, and overuse of the video game metaphor.
The OP may simply have a slow internet connection, which might account for his problems at faster speeds. Or he might be over 40 years old, which could mean his bullet reflexes have slowed a bit.
Either way, given the tone of his replies above, he just ain't listening.
Play blitz and not bullet. You're probably not used to moving that fast. I'm still not used to it.
Tactics Trainer Not Coming Up?
by leo123450 a few minutes ago
why d4 is better than e4
by Fixing_A_Hole 3 minutes ago
CHESScom: Beautiful game, beautiful mate ... I did not expect!
by habbis 3 minutes ago
Magnus vs Fritz 8.Who wins
by chessredpanda 8 minutes ago
"Abandoned" games and iPad (and iPhone) app problems
by Starshere 9 minutes ago
12/5/2013 - Too Many Attackers, Too Little Defenders
by carlosmadura 9 minutes ago
3d chess board
by chessnerd10123 10 minutes ago
What are "match points" and "board points"?
by ksakamoto 12 minutes ago
set as titled player / على النحو
by Arabiian 14 minutes ago
1. Na6 sideline (2. Rb8)
by chesskingdreamer 16 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!