14124 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
My rival had only one blocked pawn and I had bishop and pawn, but I lost by time. In real chess, can it be possible?
Yes, if you lose on time the opponent wins if he has any possibility of winning. When the opponent has any pawn left he will be awarded the win on time, even in an OTB tournament.
what more interesting is that if you have a sole knight and the opponent only king and if your opponents time runs out then its a draw but if he has a pawn in addition to the king then he loses.
Yes this is because it is not possible to checkmate someone with a sole knight and king. However, it is possible to checkmate someone by way of a pawn as this pawn can be promoted to a rook or queen which can checkmate the opposing king.
For this exact same reason, it is a draw if the same exact thing happens with a bishop, as you can`t checkmate with a sole bishop either.
That is the rule in the USCF, but FIDE would rule it a draw, I think.
If the pawn can be promoted, OK. But this pawn can't be promoted because it's blocked. My opponent's pawn had a pawn of mine in front of it, so it can't advance, and my king was at the side. That was the final position in the game. I think in real chess I could claim a draw.
"If the pawn can be promoted, OK. But this pawn can't be promoted because it's blocked."
It does not matter. If someone is out of his time, he loses if there is THEORETICALLY way for his opponent to win the game (in your example, it is true that the pawn is blocked, but theoretically there is a chance that it becomes unblocked, and so it can become a queen.) It does not matter whether it is practically impossible (opponent won't help) or not.And it is a draw, if someone runs out of time, but his opponent could not give a mate, even with the opponent's help.
It is a bit silly rule, but...
there's this fifty move rules that w/o check you can claim draw. Sometimes I suppose you lose even if the position is theoretically draw but due to time control, for some reason blunder etc.
Depending from the position, time-outs should be draw, even if your opponent has material left, i.e one just one minor piece(this last is most of cases draw, exception of you have a rook pawn, since you could get mated-though not forced).
Now look at this position:
Even if one side wants to lose on purpose, it's impossible to happen. Neither king can penetrate on opponent's position. Then, it should be a draw, and shouldn't be needed even an agreement for settle the draw-this would be categorized as 'Insufficient Material".
I hope i don't missed something obvious here.
by kayak21 a few minutes ago
Post your game for expert analysis
by heister a few minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by S_H_A_R_K 3 minutes ago
by zealandzen 4 minutes ago
To Mr X
by olichris 5 minutes ago
Should a 1300 player play and study the Smith-Morra Gambit?
by ViktorHNielsen 7 minutes ago
stockfish won't download?!
by EscherehcsE 8 minutes ago
Viewing Results from Completed Tournaments that I Have Directed
by okinawaoly 8 minutes ago
Friday Morning At Attica
by MidnightExpress1 9 minutes ago
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
by ChessMastersavi 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!