13604 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I can already hear Edvar Grieg's "In the Hall of the Mountain King" playing...
Another one of those idiotic threads this site is famous for.
"another one of those idiotic threads for which this site is famous" would be more correct. it's awkward to end sentences with prepositions.
It's also awkward to start sentences without capitalizing the first letter.
you know what is objectively speaking mediocre in terms of chess? everything up to 2200 believe it or not. perspective is a good thing.
Not accurate,you are mixing a subjective value(mediocre) with an objective measurement(elo).That makes as much sense as saying all sub-2200 chess is "evil". You clearly have something in mind,but I don't think thats the way to say it.
Mediocre is not a subjective value, it comes from "medium". A latin-origined word that means "middle". Mediocre stands for "average", a mathematical value rather than a subjective one.
No it doesnt..."average" stands for average.The first definition of "mediocre" deals with value,not mathematics.If one wishes to use a statistical/mathematical term then they should use it instead of mediocre, then there will be little room for misunderstanding.However,even with swapping "average" for "mediocre" in the above statement,the statement still makes no sense.
If this site could sell derivatives on it's idiotic threads, we'd all be billionaires.
When i first read ur thread i tended to agree, however when i went back and read again the previous postings it became clear what i meant. U are right to call "mediocre" a subjective value on it's first meaning. Or at least its most common meaning. However it seems to me that branks was using the word on its "second meaning", average.
Point taken,but I still think he could say it in a less ambiguous way.
a 1300ish calling carlsen mediocre....
I dont know if i should laugh or cry.
i agree, but online ratings don't matter much. Your rating is no better.
That is true. but i would never in a million years call carlsen mediocre, as much as i would call Kasparov or Tal a patzer.
And yes, mediocre in my book = a patzer.
My 2 cents, im done.
Damn... why do some people smoke the best things all by themselves...
Besides, we get to make fun of em. That's where the real fun lies!
"2nd Gashimov Memorial, Round 3 | Host: GM Evgeny Miroshnichenko"
How did I do?
by corum 4 minutes ago
4/19/2015 - Mate in 3
by doublebruce 8 minutes ago
What's On Your Bookshelf?
by Crazychessplaya 8 minutes ago
Every fool can win in blitz chess !
by VibrantMoves 9 minutes ago
What would be the rating of a top chess player in the late 1800s today
by Ziryab 12 minutes ago
Improve Quality of Blitz Chess
by grobgomez 17 minutes ago
Resigners who say "gg" are the Bodhisattvas of the chess world
by Swedra 17 minutes ago
by pushpendra999 26 minutes ago
weakness of my game
by Brainbrew 53 minutes ago
what is the best program to train chess?
by Plabuk 66 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!