17898 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is a thread created to debate the pros and cons of castling kingside versus castling queenside. Of course, castling queenside requires at least one more move (to get the queen out of the way), and there's always the possibility of having the a-file pawn temporarily undefended. Still, castling queenside immediately brings the rook to the d-file, thus getting more control of the center.
Kingside, however, does NOT require moving the queen. Hence, it is easier to do, and the h-pawn is always defended. Still, the f-file is more "off of the beaten path", and moving the rook to the e-file is necessary to control more of the center.
So here's my question to all of you chess fanatics: which is better? Kingside or Queenside castling? And why? Does the move needed to move the queen out of the way and the move needed to bring the kingside rook to the e-file balance out the positions in the end? Is there more of a positional advantage with one method, and more of a tactical advantage with the other?
Castle whichever way is available when the need arises. As a general rule seek to castle kingside because of its secure defensive position. However some openings will free up the queenside before the kingside.
Right now I'd say castling kingside is better :P... more because I'm mad at myself for 'castling into it' in a slightly advantageous position vs. one of the best on the site!
Well, it does of course all depend on the position. One of the ways I judge it is where my opponent has committed himself. I'm not great at juggling defence and attack, so if my opponent has castled Kingside, I'm likely to do the same, and so avoid complicated positions. (Thats the plan, anyway. Most positions look complicated to me.)
Is that kind of a "rule of thumb"? Castle same side as opponent, if he castles first?
good info. thx ezr.
It depends on what kind of game you like to play. As I say in my post above yours, I think that castling opposite sides leads to more complicated positions, where I'm more likely to make a mistake.
Another way of looking at it is that your OPPONENT is more likely to make a mistake- this would obviously suit a more precise player.
Its all a matter of opinion!
I think that kingside castle is usually better for king safety, but queenside castle is better for rook development.
Oh, I have something to add- when playing for fun, and knocking my opponent around, I will often castle queenside just to give check to his ever-frustrated king.... O-O-O+. Other than that, Kingside all the way!
I used to castle as early as possible but lately I have been trying to incorporate a little bit of strategy... say my opponent has been developing his pieces towards a certain side of the board, I try to castle on the other side, assuming it will be much harder for him to get an effective attack.
Oh and I absoultely love the kings gambit followed by a kingside castle!! It just works out beatifully! Rook on a completely open file, often defending some nice knight forks on the f-file
If I'm playing black I like castling kingside. If I'm playing White castling queenside is often a way to get the king out of the way and start an attack all at the same time.
Wait until your opponent sets up to attack one side then castle to the other. Also sometimes castling to the opposite side as your opponent is good. Sometimes castling late in the game works. In all cases it depends on the specific game and your game plan.
I castle queenside a lot becuase I see that the attack tends to be on the kingside (and you can occasionally deliver a check), but I was just told by a chess player who is much better than me and wanted to help me that castling queenside is not a good strategy.
Alekhine's Defense: Scandinavian Variation
by Tschaturanga a few minutes ago
Will ever be born a player better than Karpov?
by trotters64 2 minutes ago
A very Merry Christmas to Chess.com
by A_L_I_V_E 3 minutes ago
Too late to become GM?
by brumtown 4 minutes ago
by Iluvsmetuna 5 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by camberfoil 6 minutes ago
Solution to Avoid Lots of Sicilian Theory
by SmyslovFan 8 minutes ago
IF I OWN THE CENTER THAT MEANS I OWN YOU!!!
by A_L_I_V_E 8 minutes ago
12/26/2014 - Karpov-Huebner, Montreal 1979
by subham_behera 9 minutes ago
Diamond Membership 10 day free trial
by LakeEffect22 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!