Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

castling rook out of check?


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1

    Baznik

    If a rook is under attack can it be castled into safety if neither king nor intervening spaces are attacked?  Someone just did this to me in a game and I didn't realize it was legal Yell  It is legal, is it ?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #2

    SerbianChessStar

    yes it is.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #3

    Baznik

    SerbianChessStar wrote:

    yes it is.


    doh! 

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #4

    Spiffe

    Only the king's path matters in castling, not the rook's.  So, for instance, with Black castling queenside, e8/d8/c8 must be clear of attackers; a8/b8 do not matter.

    Don't feel bad about not knowing, it seldom comes up.  Korchnoi had to ask the arbiter the same question during one of his world championship matches against Karpov!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #5

    marvellosity

    The clue is that a rook cannot be in check. It's a rook.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #6

    Nytik

    marvellosity wrote:

    The clue is that a rook cannot be in check. It's a rook.


    There, there, marvellosity, no need to be patronising... Wink

    The key to castling is that the king must not be in (nor go through) any danger, because that would be illegal. Of course, any other piece is perfectly allowed to be under attack.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #7

    Nytik

    POST DELETED

    Whoops, double post. I've never done that before. Undecided

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #8

    AMcHarg

    marvellosity wrote:

    The clue is that a rook cannot be in check. It's a rook.


    lol Cool


Back to Top

Post your reply: