11763 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
DonnGee - your sooo smart and clever! Not.
turtle, the general points system followed is as follows:
pawn - 1pt.
knight/bishop - 3pts.
rook - 5pts.
queen - 10pts.
of course points are not everything... the position of your piece also matters.. for example you might not mind losing a bishop or rook to save a pawn on the 7th row.. and points dont have any bearing on the game result.. it is just a basic framework to help beginners understand the value of different pieces
actually queens are worth 9pts.
can u become a GM or anything from this site
everyone starts at 1200. then as you play you get a new rating. it is all based on the Glicko ratings system :) check it out - it's a fun read!
Rating is a measure of how accurate and timely you are during any match but the truth remains that nobody is unbeaten! Therefore, none should be underrated or overrated. Its a time !
Yes thats true
...i agree with you
I was looking at the list of players and came across a player with a rating of 2264 from 11 games.
From the Archive list of games, the player started at 1709. That's quite an amazing gigantic leap of 555 rating points in just 11 games.
Well I love chess.com, but I have to critizice one thing that has to do with ratings. The rating adjustment adjusts itself to the actual rating when you end the game, I believe it should be adjusted according to the rating players had when the game began.
You might wonder why?, well let's say I have 1200 rating and start a game against a 1500 player, while this game lasts I lose 5 games and decrease my rating to 900. Then I win against the 1500 guy and increase to 1300. That seems somehow unfair to me because the 1500 guy didn't expect to lose 400 rating points against a 1200. This also works the other way around, that is if the 1200 guy increases to 1600 and then wins his fisrt game against the 1500, then he will only gain a few points, when he should win more for having faced a much higher rank opponent at first.
The second thing is that many people, because of this, resign early from games they believe might lose, so that their rating decreases and then win another game against higher rated opponents and increase their ratings excessively.
I hope you understand my points, please get back to tell me what you think.
dbalanza2, there was a discussion of this a while back on this thread:
The upshot is that computing the rating change with the most up to date rating leads to the most accurate ratings.
I have read many of the articles re ratings but none seem to addres the question of what percentile each raing falls into.
This should be a table issued by the web-site, showing (for example) that
Top decile above 2500
2nd Decile 2300 -2500
3rd Decile 2100-2300
and so on. At the moment, I am approaching 2000 but have no idea whether that is good, average, or what?
What about it, web-site analyst?
What's your favorite excuse for why you lost a game of chess?
by varelse1 a few minutes ago
Which is the best opening
by X_PLAYER_J_X 3 minutes ago
Positional Play: What is it, really? Show us an example
by Fiveofswords 6 minutes ago
HOW GOOD WOULD OTHER CHAMPIONS BE IF THEY WERE AS ADDICTED AS FISCHER
by EFV1728 6 minutes ago
Looking for a (Female) Mixed-Doubles Partner for World Open
by X_PLAYER_J_X 7 minutes ago
5/8/2015 - White Wins
by PugsSayMoo 12 minutes ago
best defensive openings
by t-ram87 13 minutes ago
My road from 1200 to 2100 in less than 2 years
by roder_toro 14 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by ILoveScotch 15 minutes ago
Sicilian defense, how did i do?
by Anubhav_2000 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!