Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess rating system


  • 3 years ago · Quote · #981

    Rafchess

    [COMMENT DELETED]

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #982

    Rafchess

    Somdat wrote:

    Guys Just enjoy the games!


     Smile Me too !!!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #983

    EvenBounce

    how about you?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #984

    Rafchess

    inzmamali wrote:

    how about you?


     Innocent Its very fine!! and how is with you!!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #985

    EvenBounce

    how about you?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #986

    BenRivera

    lol

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #987

    BenRivera

    the more you play the more it averages towards accuracy.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #988

    Rafchess

    BenRivera wrote:

    the more you play the more it averages towards accuracy.


    So it is !!!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #989

    nonowho

    AlecKeen wrote:
    Becca wrote: Rating has its place but its not the most important thing. Sometimes you can lose a game on time and it will seriously affect your rating this has nothing to do with how well you play.

    Oh yes it does! How well you play includes how well you manage your time. Time is as much part of Chess as it is in other games. In football you could score the greatest goal in history, but if the referee blows time before it goes in it doesn't count. Similarly in Chess if you don't get your moves in within the time, you lose, and correctly so.


    well actually in football you get to finish your play after the ref blows the whistle

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #990

    suzettemy

    I hate the clock when I'm short of time, but I think it's only fair when my opponent's flag falls.  :)  

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #991

    HunterTahu

    "well actually in football you get to finish your play after the ref blows the whistle"

    True dat Nono!

    Alec is obviously more chess than football, (or does he mean soccer?)

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #992

    rt3378

    IMO do provisional ratings, then everyone would start where they belong

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #993

    Rafchess

    suzettemy wrote:

    I hate the clock when I'm short of time, but I think it's only fair when my opponent's flag falls.  :)  


     Could it be your enemy"s !!!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #994

    bluecard5499

    ratings arent always acurate, keep that in mind. If someone doesnt play for a while then their rating will be lower (or higher) than their actuall skill

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #995

    Spidey3000

    viswanathan wrote:
    turtle wrote: i am starting to understand the rating system, but how do you determine points during a game? are certain peices worth different points? 

    turtle, the general points system followed is as follows:

    pawn - 1pt.

    knight/bishop - 3pts.

    rook - 5pts.

    queen - 10pts.

    of course points are not everything... the position of your piece also matters.. for example you might not mind losing a bishop or rook to save a pawn on the 7th row.. and points dont have any bearing on the game result.. it is just a basic framework to help beginners understand the value of different pieces


    Just adjusting this, but isnt the queen worth 9 points?

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #996

    TonyMooney

    Somebody told me that the rook valuation of 5 points is a western idea - it's only 4 in Russia. Don't know if that's true - but it puts a different perspective on the exchange of two minor pieces for a rook and a pawn if it is.

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #997

    Rafchess

    TonyMooney wrote:

    Somebody told me that the rook valuation of 5 points is a western idea - it's only 4 in Russia. Don't know if that's true - but it puts a different perspective on the exchange of two minor pieces for a rook and a pawn if it is.


     Cool While playing with chess.com its advisable to follow the  follow the principles laid there in !!

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #998

    tynmar

    I don't particular understand the ratings. Just beaten someone with a thirteen hundred rating on blitz, I am on less than one thousand (still getting used to not running out of time....the number of times my clock has ran out with me one or two moves from checkmate is annoying...but i guess it happens to everyone) and I get an rating of +27...very disappointing....

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #999

    Rafchess

    tynmar wrote:

    I don't particular understand the ratings. Just beaten someone with a thirteen hundred rating on blitz, I am on less than one thousand (still getting used to not running out of time....the number of times my clock has ran out with me one or two moves from checkmate is annoying...but i guess it happens to everyone) and I get an rating of +27...very disappointing....


     Innocent just one time playing good would not serve purpose!! pl gon playing more withmore success with highier Rating players then y'will see your ratings going more up !! Rating standard is a necessary evil without which U can not gauge .

  • 3 years ago · Quote · #1000

    Shahaliyev

    The first rating is about 12200. But i think it must be 1600.

Back to Top

Post your reply: