10968 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I do! I do!
I went up against this one guy I never expected to beat in my wildest dreams, and I won three times in a row. On the other side of the ledger, I completely screwed up and lost to someone who had a queen and a half dozen or so pawns against a king and three, and couldn't work out how to put me out of my misery.
I should have tried harder to draw that last game. Oh well.
actually someone did get zero, i don't remember who
A zero rating would be achievable but you'd most likely need to cheat by using multiple accounts. This would be the reverse of using multiple accounts to boost your rating. I can't see anyone ever bothering to do such a useless thing.
It's more like a 1700 FIDE rating is a 2000 chess.com turn-based rating.
Live chess is a bit closer I think, but I don't play here much either, and some of the ratings have changed.
Everything I've read on chess.com says that comparisons between different rating systems/pools are very difficult to make. However I also read that FIDE ratings are on average, 200~300 points LOWER than chess.com turn-based. Same as Chess 960 ratings are on average 300~400 points lower than standard turned-based ratings, (different pools of players + less games played).
A rating can give you sort of weakness . Do not look at the opponent's rating when
you play, find a way to cover it up so it does not matter anymore.
I agree. However I know that I can lose to players rated way below me and win against players rated above me, so I always try to play carefully...and you never know if and when your opponent decides to use some engine assistance.
How about the different game types and the points associated with those? I was wondering if anyone could break this down for me, I'm a little confused as to why a 10 min game I only get 15-30 points, and then I play a 15|10 game and will get 100+ points for a win... Is it that because I'm not an extremely high rated player? Or is it a combination of who I play, their rank, my rank, and how the game plays out (ie. if I lose with a majority of my pieces remaining on the board or lose with just my king on the board).
It's doubtless because you've played far less games in Standard.
The pieces on the board do not matter. What matters is your rating vs the rating of your opponent, and how accurate the algorithm thinks the ratings of you and your opponent are. For example, if your opponent has played very few games recently, your rating will not move as much because their rating may not be as accurate. But if YOU have not played many games recently, then your rating will move MORE because YOUR rating is deemed to be less accurate.
Alright, thank you for the clarification David. For the record, what is "standard"? I usually play 10 or 15 min games.
Bullet rating - For games under 3 minutes.
Blitz rating - For games of 3 minutes to 14 minutes.
Standard rating - For games 15 minutes and longer.
For details, look here: http://support.chess.com/Knowledgebase/Article/View/94/0/why-are-there-three-different-ratings-in-live-chess
David, I appreciate you answeing my question, as well as posting a link. That cleared it up for me.
Great, so I don't have to start at 0!
people are grandmasters at 2400 + thats why we have ratings or we would all be grandmasters.You can play unrated games if you want this means that your rating will not go up or down.Blitz games are for people who prefer to play fast, standard is 30 minutes these games usually result in a checkmate.
2400 is a bit low for a GM.
yes but u hav i no a gm hu got 4/6 in a tourny he lost 2 a 1750 and 1810 and he was one of the highest seeds
Can you solve this puzzle? (It's kind of tricky, but you can do it if you try hard!)
nigel short says women brain not suited for chess. Give 1 word for how you feel?
by lisa_zhang_tok a few minutes ago
My System Examples
by Mikado777 a few minutes ago
Youtube - recommendations
by isayoldboy a few minutes ago
Nigel Short: Women's brains not chess brains
by Elubas 7 minutes ago
How many moves do you think ahead?
by The_Vision 8 minutes ago
Vote Chess Help
by DEATHW1SH 18 minutes ago
Rating Inflation: 100 Elo points starting in 1985
by kleelof 22 minutes ago
New chess circuit to be announced in Saint Louis
by highhowareyou 26 minutes ago
Good chess books with no chess in them?
by wiscmike 27 minutes ago
4/24/2015 - Setting Them Up For Failure
by ian_w_yip 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!