Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess rating system


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #121

    humble

    I'm a bit suspicious... My current rating is almost 1600. It just can't be correct. But still, I just beat a 1500 player, and I have slaughtered several 1200-1300 players. On the other hand, my rating on FICS (just to name one) is ca 1000, and my RD is much much lower there. Then again, thats a blitz rating... I just don't know what to make of this. Is there any way to see the RD here without getting a premium membership?
  • 8 years ago · Quote · #122

    karlwig

    The only problem I see with the rating system is that the odds you get when playing against newly registered users (with 1200) when you have like 1600.  Since they haven't played any games, you could easilly run into a player who's real elo is 2000. And against an opponent like that, you should get much better point "odds" - but when you loose your rating will drop like 200, and if you win it will only go up like 20... Even when he's a lot better than you. On the other hand, if that player has already played 10 games instead of 0, his chess.com rating will probably be around 2000 - and then you can play against him with good odds. Anyone get my point here?


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #123

    karlwig

    mackandstella wrote: viswanathan wrote: turtle wrote: i am starting to understand the rating system, but how do you determine points during a game? are certain peices worth different points? 

    turtle, the general points system followed is as follows:

    pawn - 1pt.

    knight/bishop - 3pts.

    rook - 5pts.

    queen - 10pts.

    of course points are not everything... the position of your piece also matters.. for example you might not mind losing a bishop or rook to save a pawn on the 7th row.. and points dont have any bearing on the game result.. it is just a basic framework to help beginners understand the value of different pieces


    My chess teacher has taught me a queens is worth 9


     And your chess teacher is right. A queen is worth 9. That is also the value she has on chess.com


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #124

    texaspete

    NotAGM (post #145) - I got 1545 on the 'fair ELO' link http://www.chessmaniac.com/ELORating/ELO_Chess_Rating.shtml- not bad really, given that's where my rating has tended to gravitate towards (am currently 1654, but a historic high and a little misleading - players at this level on this site are generally better than me)
  • 8 years ago · Quote · #125

    himself

    o0obruceleeo0o wrote: So the reason Kasparov is better than me is because his rating is higher than mine?

     no.the reason kasparov is better than you is because hed beat you in less than twenty moves.:P


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #126

    MissArie

    Hi Everyone! Me too, When I started playing online chess in here. I got 1200 ratings.
  • 8 years ago · Quote · #127

    lukeyboy_xx

    ratings just give you a idea how good a player is
  • 8 years ago · Quote · #128

    tyler603

    justice_avocado wrote: 1361 is higher than 1200. this isn't golf.

    hahahahahahaha


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #129

    Eternal_Autumn

    Ratings aren't as important as learning new things. Not on chess.com anyway.
  • 8 years ago · Quote · #130

    BILL_5666

    karlwig wrote:

    The only problem I see with the rating system is that the odds you get when playing against newly registered users (with 1200) when you have like 1600.  Since they haven't played any games, you could easilly run into a player who's real elo is 2000. And against an opponent like that, you should get much better point "odds" - but when you loose your rating will drop like 200, and if you win it will only go up like 20... Even when he's a lot better than you. On the other hand, if that player has already played 10 games instead of 0, his chess.com rating will probably be around 2000 - and then you can play against him with good odds. Anyone get my point here?


    A necessary evil?  I don't think there is any other way around this problem.  You will just have to win those points back from someone else.


  • 8 years ago · Quote · #131

    stdavid

    Yes this is about right but you have to remember that a bishop can cover more squares than a knight and you can mate with 2 bishops but not with 2 knights. Therefore a bishop is generally considered a little bit better especially if the game gets towards the end-game. If you had a situation where one side had a knight and a few pawns and the other had a bishop and the same number of pawns, the percentages would be in favour of the bishop. The better the player the better the chances of getting  a draw.....the knight cannot make a mistake!
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #132

    pradipbargur

    i want to play chess in tournaments.....how it possible..... please help me


  • 7 years ago · Quote · #133

    Fotoman

    Prad, welcome. If they don't have chess tourneys locally for you, this might be your best option. Go to the tournament section and just join one. If you are a talkative person, tell your opponents and maybe you can make new friends and learn from them too.

    Good luck 


  • 7 years ago · Quote · #134

    rajeshbuddar

    I was playing chess since i was 6 yrs old ,chess is a mind freshing game
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #135

    Ridzwan

    i get your point now
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #136

    TheValera

    so if your opponents score affects oyur score?

     


  • 7 years ago · Quote · #137

    cyberknight92

    yes. depending on your opponents score, you can earn or lose any number of points.
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #138

    pedro823

    lol chess rating system is easy: how many wins, many points
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #139

    Paul

    I've only played 3 games so far on  line and noted I have a rating that changes with each win/loss - but - the "today's rank" is blank - does that change after I have played so many games?
  • 7 years ago · Quote · #140

    jr571

    After a few games (around 10) or a certain amount of time, the ranking box fills out.  

     

    I've always wondered about this, since joining the site.  For those who do have USCF/FIDE/Elo ratings, do you find that there is a significant discrepancy between those and chess.com ratings?  I'm suspecting so, but without an OTB ranking of my own, I've got no way of telling.

     Thanks.



Back to Top

Post your reply: