12570 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
turtle, the general points system followed is as follows:
pawn - 1pt.
knight/bishop - 3pts.
rook - 5pts.
queen - 10pts.
of course points are not everything... the position of your piece also matters.. for example you might not mind losing a bishop or rook to save a pawn on the 7th row.. and points dont have any bearing on the game result.. it is just a basic framework to help beginners understand the value of different pieces
That is so true, I once had to give up a knight and a rook to gain position for the mate that I got within the next couple of moves... I was proud of myself. lol But I've been told to keep in mind that having two bishops is more powerful than one bishop and one knight and likewise two bishops are stronger than two knights. I'm guessing because the two bishops can command both colors and this always isn't the case with two knights. Any thoughts on this? I think I'd personally rather have 2 bishops rather than two knights.
My Chess teacher says the Queen is 9 points!!!!!!!!
i dont get it
The only problem I see with the rating system is that the odds you get when playing against newly registered users (with 1200) when you have like 1600. Since they haven't played any games, you could easilly run into a player who's real elo is 2000. And against an opponent like that, you should get much better point "odds" - but when you loose your rating will drop like 200, and if you win it will only go up like 20... Even when he's a lot better than you. On the other hand, if that player has already played 10 games instead of 0, his chess.com rating will probably be around 2000 - and then you can play against him with good odds. Anyone get my point here?
My chess teacher has taught me a queens is worth 9
And your chess teacher is right. A queen is worth 9. That is also the value she has on chess.com
no.the reason kasparov is better than you is because hed beat you in less than twenty moves.:P
A necessary evil? I don't think there is any other way around this problem. You will just have to win those points back from someone else.
i want to play chess in tournaments.....how it possible..... please help me
Prad, welcome. If they don't have chess tourneys locally for you, this might be your best option. Go to the tournament section and just join one. If you are a talkative person, tell your opponents and maybe you can make new friends and learn from them too.
by Irontiger a few minutes ago
My game against GM Timur Gareev (2680) - draw!
by Chessgrandmaster2001 a few minutes ago
ruy lopez exchange variation any good for white
by jonnin a few minutes ago
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6
by Kasprov12 a few minutes ago
Chess coordinate system difficulties
by solskytz a few minutes ago
Fighting a Game Without my Queen
by Irontiger 3 minutes ago
Chuck Norris vs Magnus Carlsen
by Chessgrandmaster2001 4 minutes ago
by elig5428 6 minutes ago
Is it possible that there are psychic chess masters
by trysts 6 minutes ago
5/24/2013 - Winning With Technique
by xDae 7 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com