10765 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The system manages the allocation of the two players. Therefore you have an opponent with a quite equal strength.
If this repeats anything previously said, then I apologize, but there's NO WAY I'm reading through 55 pages of posts! On the general topic of ratings, I think there must be some sort of discrepancy in the rating of the problems on Tactics Trainer and the rating you get from playing online games. My online rating here at chess.com hovers between 1200 and 1300, however, I hover between 800 and 900 rating on Tactics Trainer! That's just too huge of a difference.
This is my own experience: When I am playing games, I have a plan. When I am doing Tactics Trainer, I am on the clock, plunged into a position I did not create and so have not been thinking about. When I improve on Tactics Trainer, I improve in my games as well, and as a result, have a higher rating. So far, my Tactics Trainer score has always been a few hundred points below my online rating, but as the points go up in Tactics Trainer, the rating points go up in online chess. It makes sense to me. :)
when i first started the tactics trainer, my rating plummetted but soon i got used to the format...now i have an idea of what i should be doing because i have completed similar problems before....of course, sometimes i miss the obvious and fail but that is chess......
u r ok !!
everyone starts at 1200. then as you play you get a new rating. it is all based on the Glicko ratings system :) check it out - it's a fun read!
may be nearest approximate also!!
Fun read?????? my brain shut down after 10 seconds......
Try to keep a mugful hot cofee at ur side and u wll see no power failure !!!
lol..not even a continuous intravenous drip of coffee would keep me awake for that...if anything gets too technical my eyes go into instant glaze mode.....
Then Sir, u think quick & execute instant !Game is fun & no serious technicality.and no worry for win or loss. And exercise more in chess and Physicals.Thanks ,
??????????? I think i now understand the phrase ‘Two nations separated by a common language.’ I understand the words you used, but when put together I am not sure what they mean.......are we still talking about the attachment explaining the glickorating system....?
I think that it doesn't matter how well one plays a game if one winds up losing the game. I think the one who wins is the quick-thinker or with the better strategy.
"The person who makes the 2nd to the last mistake wins." ___NM Robert Haines
hello everybody im a new comer and im epic at this game called chess
is there any comments about chess
just look your previous comment: you are an epic in Chess !!!!!!
I am interested in the live v. online ratings. My rating for online is generally much higher than for live. I suspect that my live rating is a more accurate measure of my true strength because it is based equal use of time. I do better at online because I spend more time studying the position than most of my opponnents and gain an advantage that way. I have noticed that most players have a higher online rating and the average online rating on the site are higher than the average live rating.
I also have the impression that most online and live ratings tend to be higher than over the board ratings. The Glicko system was created for over the board ratings. It would be interesting for some math whiz to come up with some algorithym to estimate equivalent over the board ratings based on online and live ratings.
Now, before someone goes off on me about the insignificance of ratings, the value of ratings, in my opinion, is two fold. First, rathings allow players to find similarly skilled opponenents so that they may have an enjoyable game. Second, ratings provide a benchmark against which to measure progress for those who wish to progress.
Others perhaps just enjoy beating up on lesser skilled opponnents and will lose a bunch of quick games from time to time to keep their rating down so that they can have fun picking on weaker players.
Admittedly, the system is not perfect, but all in all, I think it works pretty well.
Which Opening Runs "Deepest"
by ChessCamper a few minutes ago
Dark square strategy, killing the king
by eglun a few minutes ago
by Shivsky 4 minutes ago
post your funniest illegal games here!!!!!!!!
by Mooner01 8 minutes ago
12/6/2013 - Mate in 8
by rematch_dontBscared 9 minutes ago
Are the best humans and computers even close to chess perfection?
by oldenglish80024oz 10 minutes ago
by SwellGuyIsBoss 12 minutes ago
Which time controll for average/ball park OTB rating
by Shivsky 13 minutes ago
Which book on tactics? - Chernev vs Nunn vs Weteschnik
by Somebodysson 17 minutes ago
what the #$%^was he playing and how did he win?
by Somebodysson 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!