13203 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think it would be better to start at 900.
Starting at 1200 means that everyone is overrated. I know for certain from playing chessmaster on the PC at my chess.com rating means I get pasted. My real rating according to that program is under 1200.
Just my 2 euros :)
Oh yes it does! How well you play includes how well you manage your time. Time is as much part of Chess as it is in other games. In football you could score the greatest goal in history, but if the referee blows time before it goes in it doesn't count. Similarly in Chess if you don't get your moves in within the time, you lose, and correctly so.
Maybe not much effect on your rating in some cases. I played some1 almost 150 rate higher than me and when i won, i was upgraded just 1 rate and him less by 1 rate. teh i played another 1200 starter and lost almost 35 rate and he jumped up to 135something as a first bonus??????
I still don't get it????????????
ratings dont even matter
Yep. Though I must say, I can't stand being a very low rating. It's demeaning. I know it's a game, but winning is the point.
if i get challenged, it tells me how many points i risk or gain, how do i know if i challenge someone else?
i never see how many points i can risk losing or gaining ... where do u find that out?
true. blitz for good memory and sight. plodders rely more on their analytical skills, performing poorly in blitzes. so i think....anyway.
I agree , 1200 is average, and you can rise or down, play and no ask, or you can do yourself the website.
ok then... i think the ratin is a great idea... but still dont understand it ...
I like joeyson's earlier response. His answer was don't worry about ratings just play. After all, we all hope we're playing a person at the other end not a person using a computer.
o0obruceleeo0o wrote: 1200 is supposed to be the average rating in the elo rating system, so most chess playing websites start all players at 1200.
ok then ... so u can be great player and u still start at 1200
Anand could join chess.com and he'd start out at 1200.
yeah even tho he is good ?
"Death Match 14: GM Moradiabadi vs GM Zherebukh - Hosts IM Rensch & Co!"
3 reasons Why "Online Chess" ratings deserves no repsect
by LongIslandMark 3 minutes ago
Your Immortal Game
by Randomemory 3 minutes ago
Could anyone do a analysis on this game
by karuthakuthira 3 minutes ago
mathematical advances, to help speed up things.
by chris212121 9 minutes ago
by MrDamonSmith 11 minutes ago
by FirebrandX 12 minutes ago
Chess on Google Plus
by brokenmind 14 minutes ago
by skakmadurinn 15 minutes ago
Fair play policy?
by bustardtweeker 17 minutes ago
What time do you play your best chess?
by Abhishek2 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com