11049 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have a question about a chess stat. Perhaps I'm not thinking about this right, but it says that the average rating of players that i beat is 1466, when i lose its 1659...so far so good, but then the average for players i DRAW is 1743...meaning that I draw higher rated players on average than those who beat me? Sample size for draws is 41 and loss is 408, but still it seems like the opposite of what i'd expect and somewhat weird. Theories?
You up your game for the really really tough opposition and manage to draw with them? Maybe they misjudge you while those with a rating of around 1660 still see you as a threat so they concentrate more?
As a diamond, you can see all the games you played. You can determine if the stat is wrong. If it is, contact staff.
If, however, you have a tendency to lose against players rated lower than yourself, send me a challenge!
There are just too many variables to give an answer with any pretense of accuracy. The very nature of the rating pool here, or pools since many don't play across time limits so much, is constant change and flux. People come, they go, some are overrated, some underrated, you can't tell when you play them.
One possible explanation, since those you beat or draw are averaging very close to your own rating, is that your opposition is out of balance by playing too many lower-rated players and not enough who are higher. In general, it's a good idea to play within a 200-300 point range +/-, and to try to balance the numbers along the distribution. Of course that is easier said than done - and it may not even be the cause anyway.
12/5/2013 - Too Many Attackers, Too Little Defenders
by marmaladecat a few minutes ago
Anyone Played 1000 Games?
by ImNotaFish 4 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer encourages blitz, not growth
by ModularGroupGamma 5 minutes ago
Tactics training score/ live game elo?
by Scottrf 6 minutes ago
What makes c4 and c5 good??
by Or_theBashaKiller 9 minutes ago
Shogi, xiangqi, and other variants
by FromMuToYou 35 minutes ago
is this player better then Magnus
by dashkee94 43 minutes ago
a way to sign off for the night?
by AlCzervik 52 minutes ago
Winning coming from a pawn down Giri-Aronian
by LoekBergman 56 minutes ago
Anand: An Embarrassing Performance
by JTLindskogHageman 63 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!