11213 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Example: I have very poor vision that wasn't diagnosed until I was almost 9; because of that my visualization skills are vritually nonexistent. Its a REAL hindrance to me that I'm working hard to overcome. My wife on the other hand has almost savant-like visualization abilities...living technicolor no less...I tell her she would be an awesome chess player, but...you guessed it...she has zero interest in learning the game.
Edit button is broken...
Anyway while talent is a factor exposure is far more important. Fischer had 2000s in his backyard since he was 6. Kasparov went to a school dedicated to churning out GMs. The average person doesn't have that. The average person is completely on their own with nothing but tons of information that is mostly useless to them. If you're surrounded by great players constantly then that simply rubs off and it doesn't take much to figure out what you're doing wrong.
That plateau is exactly what happens to most people. They get to a point and then they stall because they don't know what they need to get any better. With no one to ask and tons of misinformation out there they just quit as they reckon that there's no good way to figure out what to do to improve - either that or they simply apply incorrect measures in the hope that change occurs.
What did Bobby and Kaspy do? They tugged on the sleeve of the grandmaster next to them...
I agree, that's why whenever I get a chance to play online against whoever's looking for a game I try to pick someone significantly higher than me...humbling but educational. I'm playing a guy right now a few hundred points higher and the game (5 days per move) has been going on since JULY. I'm up a pawn in the endgame but it'll probably end up drawn. To me that's a victory and an education.
Edit button is broken...
What did Bobby and Kasper do? They tugged on the sleeve of the grandmaster next to them...
Russia used to teach all the kids chess, and most were seen not to have GM talent.
I'm watching a series of documentaries on the the Science Channel right now, called "Genius Minds" that prove what I've been saying all along. They have learned through experimentation that different brains do indeed function differently giving people different talents. Even brain injuries can bring about talents that have never been there before.
I've seen that same show several times. Apparently I'm supposed to be an 800 player and that's all there is to it!
If you can spell you can get a much higher rating.
You know you can get higher than that if you practice.
en passant = Cheater!
by pilichowder 5 minutes ago
3 Queens - Is it going too far?
by txtan 9 minutes ago
by txtan 11 minutes ago
Wooden Chess set
by UpcountryRain 12 minutes ago
Not announcing check in scholastic tournaments
by DENVERHIGH 14 minutes ago
What do i do wrong
by AzraelA 18 minutes ago
old master of chess
by Knightly_News 20 minutes ago
i feel bad for both UK and America chess
by enjaytee 23 minutes ago
Chess book for travelling
by Bronco 26 minutes ago
DOES THE FOOD WE EAT EFFECTS THE RATE OF WINNIG IN CHESS?
by Migilla 28 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!