12121 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I don't know about plateaus, but I am still trying to figure out how my blitz rating apparently starts at 1200, and I have a pretty decent 42-28-3 record, yet my rating has dropped to 1135? ;)
My "standard" rating of 1400 is closer to my old USCF rating.
Also, ratings seem to be relative. In the boonies, they mean less, for example. I am a 1400-ish player but I have played at a 1750 level in one tournament in Athens, Greece, and I have a winning record versus a 1900 player in Wyoming in the handful of games we played.
When I first started playing chess I was stuck at that 800-900 range for well over a year. Then some of the intermediate tactics started to stick & I quickly shot up a over 1000 in a short period. Then only a few months later I reached the elusive 1200 mark and have been there for about 5 years (though sometimes I don't play for long periods, like entire years after I "quit"). These ratings are not official, but I have pretty much the same rating on chessmaster 10, 11, grandmaster edition, & here on chess.com. And when I used to play on yahoo I was rated around 1200. That seems to be my ceiling.
I have also noticed that on chessmaster I can win or draw any opponent under 1300 and only lose if I am really not focusing. But, I have never had a victory against any of the 'personalities' over 1300, either losses or draws [(mostly losses) but I did get a draw once agains a personality rated over 2000 (game was only 23 moves and it forced the draw on me via 3 fold)].
As I understand these ratings are benchmarks. I could be wrong...
below 800 you know the moves and the rules.
800 - 1200 beginner
1200 - 1600 intermediate
1600 - 1800 expert
1800 - 2000 strong expert/master
2000+ - Master/IM/GM
But do study chess like endgames, strategy and tactics?
That's who I am getting matched up with. Not like I chose to play the 800 rated players...
I guess you already know it, you can set a rating range of opponents here.
If one is playing in blitz tournaments, how does one avoid the 800-ish players in the sub-1200 tourneys?
You are right, though, I don't use a rating filter/option even outside tourneys. It seems elitist, somehow. I just play the people I am presented with and I don't cherry-pick opponents to nurse my rating. I am starting to gather reading the forums that the rating system as it sits fosters players that coddle their ratings.
Maybe you can help me with that...I notice that you recently gained 30 rating points by beating the same player 9 times in a row...nicely done.
Only a 40 year break...
by RogerOT 4 minutes ago
Friend is in prision
by derekj1978 5 minutes ago
7/25/2014 - Sahovic - Karolyi 1986
by dufferps 17 minutes ago
kicked from livechess
by evTourniquet 23 minutes ago
Ruth Haring: 'Girls are bad at chess'
by kleelof 42 minutes ago
YOUR IQ compared to" World Chess Champion" Garry Kasparov ..
by Optimissed 46 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by kantifields 46 minutes ago
Post Your Jokes Here!
by AnishBhargava 57 minutes ago
7/24/2014 - Mate in 5
by keyakku 63 minutes ago
I Don't See the Point of the Touch-Move Rule
by Optimissed 68 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!