Computer Analysis Glitches?

So I noticed the get computer analysis option, which lets regular members get 1 analyzed game a week. So I tried it on an interesting game of mine. Given how the analysis takes several hours to run, I was hoping for some pretty neat stuff. What the cp actually happened was this:

1.e3 c5?, suggesting instead (1...d5 2.e5 c5 3.d4 Nc6 4. dxc5 5. Bb6 Bxc5) as black's best continuation. White's supposed refuatation for 1...c5? is (2. Nc3 Nc6 3. Nf3 e5 4. Bb5 Nf6 5. 0-0 +-)

Anyone else have similar experiences? It's kind of absurd that the computer thinks the sicilian defense is a mistake (or have computers officially declared 1...d5 as the antidote for 1.e4?) I've posted some more of the analysis below, for your pleasure:

I also noticed that the cp is supposed to be 2000 strength. Doubt any of the 2000s I know would suggest those moves...

Jajajajajajaja ... It's just that the computer says that if you want to play c5 you need to do some prophylaxis before... Jajajaja, that was weird. I haven't experienced something like this.

Tried it again, and it didn't give me good analysis this time either. It's quite a pointless feature.