Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Consequences of the Glicko Rating System


  • 2 years ago · Quote · #1

    RainbowRising

    While it has huge benefits (not included here), it is subject to abuse, for example:

     The top rated blitz player has achieved his mega rating having only played SEVEN games.

    As you scroll through the list, you will find many players on the front page have only played a handful of games, and even more have played less than 100 or so.

    It seems necessary, then, to introduce some measures against this, such as e.g. a provisional rating which becmes real after so many games, etc.

    Thoughts?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #2

    Scottrf

    Mehh, you could get the highest rating in the world by playing 1000 rated players, what good does it do you?

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #3

    glicko

    In addition to strategies like reporting ranked lists by rating only among players who have some specified maximum RD, another approach I've advocated is to rank players not by rating, but by a quantity like rating - RD or even rating - 2*RD. 

    Even another idea is to rank players according to a quantity like

    (rating-2200)/RD

    which turns out to be monotonically related to the probability a player's true strength is greater than 2200.

          - Mark (a.k.a. glicko)

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #4

    DrawMaster

    Looks like a t-value, of sorts, that (rating - 2200)/RD. Smile

  • 2 years ago · Quote · #5

    glicko

    Yes, in fact it's a z-value (from a normal distribution), since a player's rating under the Glicko system is assumed to be approximately normally distributed.

             - Mark

  • 24 months ago · Quote · #6

    RainbowRising

    I guess the staff have no issue with this :S

  • 22 months ago · Quote · #7

    bones1950

    My Question is ...

    If Im rated 1200 with this glicko,

    What would my rating be in  the elo system that USCF uses????


Back to Top

Post your reply: