Hello chess.com members. I was curious as to what kind of content people would like to see posted for them to read. I have posted games of my own that I have found interesting and received very minimal response. One of my ideas for my own chess development is to play 100 chess games and annotate every game in its entirety. Is anyone interested in seeing such posts? If the response is the same as the rest of the game stuff I've posted, I'm better spending my time on other things. Do people want puzzles instead? I was also tossing around the idea of endgame instruction along with assorted puzzles. I want to add content to chess.com, but the current lack of feedback is bumming me out.

I would like to see your interesing games, annotated of course, and see your point of view in your games.

i would like to see puzzles from your games, no1 elses

i would like to see instructions on b+b or b+n or some advanced endgame stuff.

Not everyday I have the time to go through other peoples posts/games, but I remember checking some of yours and would persuade you to continue. Even though I often avoid commenting (once we have much more qualified players around here), I will if it means for you to keep doing what you like doing.

I really think a 100 game quest would be cool. I think it would be cool to have fully annotated games, supplimented by puzzles either pulled directly from the game, or based on ideas that I learned by playing the game.  I'm thinking maybe have two blogs, one with endgame lessons, the other with the 100 game journey. A sustainable pace would probably be two games a week, one with each colour.

why is the topic name given so?

In the majority of my posts, the discussion is so quiet that crickets can be heard.  Sometimes I feel like a comedian who is just tanking, and the audience is just staring at them.