8516 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
MiraculousOne
Hi guys,
If anyone out there has read or has this book please help me understand his way of writing chess notation. On page 54 the instructions as notations don't seem to match the de Groot exercise A. For example, it states if I play 1. Nxc6 which is first an empty square and second no white knight is capable of moving to that square in a single move! It also states it will win a bishop pair if it plays Nd7. That too is not possible in one play. Unless it means Ne5 then Nd7. I'm not sure. This is somewhat confusing.
kco
Hi, note: that diagram came from page 16 (with the white knight on e5)
will win the bishop pair if Nxc6 then black do Qxb2, Nxd7 ! (from your diagram)
Hi, I'm new and I need the next step
by DiscGolfGirl a few minutes ago
18 Queens and two Knights
by Haiku575 a few minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by GargleBlaster 3 minutes ago
Best chess masters biographies?
by LadyMisil 3 minutes ago
Tactics Trainer problems
by LewisSkolnick 3 minutes ago
5/22/2013 - Good Night to the Enemy
by volcarona 4 minutes ago
What happened to Josh Waitzkin?
by samog123 4 minutes ago
Unable to share games to Facebook
by TDeSeno 5 minutes ago
18 Queens + 4 Rooks
by Haiku575 5 minutes ago
A classic Karpov brilliancy
by InoYamanaka 6 minutes ago