10354 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
That is a tough question. When should you resign? Some people hate resigning, but in some situations, you must know that you will lose. So what do you believe is the proper situation to resign? I personally think..
Once I'm down material (2 pawns+) and without counterplay I'll resign. I will also resign after hanging a piece.. which I seem to do strangely often on this site, guess it's just a matter of getting used to the look of the site.
Being down in material isn't always bad. Position is worth more than material, you can be down more than a rook in material and still have the upper hand.
If you wanted a answer for the question then no not really, I don't like resigning and usually don't until I can't see any posibility to even get a draw.
As I am playing better players, I am finding that I am resigning more often. I only like to resign when the checkmate is only a few moves away and the opponent has made it clear that he sees the checkmate. There have been a few times when I should have been checkmated, but the opponent made a mistake and I was able to get a draw or a win (ganted these were players below my rating).
I dislike being pressured into resigning, especially when I don't see the checkmate yet.
queenie .offcourse he should have accepted the draw. No doubt about that.
general CC ettiquite at the higher levels (1800+ i'd say) usually means resigning if you hang a piece accidentally.
Either way though, resign once you know your game is lost.
edit - there are two 'exceptions' in my books..
1- Don't stall and hope for a time out, don't stall at all for that matter.
2- If the game is drawn and your opponent offers, accept it.. playing on is frustrating, time wasting, and unfair (being as in real life a tournament director would force the draw).
No you don't know when to resign, or No you don't resign?
I am asking this question since on Saturday, my friends and I played a small simul (4 boards) vs a 2600. I was the only to resign, as I was down a rook. None of the others resigned, yet they were in just as bad situations or worse (5 pawns vs nothing, royal forks)
OTB vs. GM's might be a little differen't.. they don't really expect you to resign and they are by some standards already wasting time so why worry :P.
I would have resigned too... actually, I resign and draw extremely early in most of my games.. it's a bad habit.. I just don't like playing once the position starts getting 'boring'.
Improved chess understanding
by shell_knight 6 minutes ago
what exactly gets censored in chat?
by RonaldJosephCote 9 minutes ago
I broke 1800!
by Oraoradeki 18 minutes ago
Is there a set that will help me beat better players?
by 9kick9 26 minutes ago
Do amateurs spend an inordinate amount of time and energy on chess?
by Neena-H 30 minutes ago
ADMIN -- Someone deleted the "Egalitarian Troll Society"
by EscherehcsE 30 minutes ago
Bughouse and Live 960?
by manspider29 44 minutes ago
The engine prank
by heinzie 45 minutes ago
The Danish Gambit
by ponz111 51 minutes ago
Positional (calm) player vs tactical (sharp) one
by Goob63 54 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!