11605 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Have to agree dr spud
chess also have a lot to do with deception, foresight and awareness without those you could be good at math all you want and get you king cornered.
If a1 = 11 and h8 = 88, and if g2 = 72 and g7 = 77, you would add 1 to 72 to make 73 for an opening pawn move. Or 52+2=54 for e4. Your opponent would subtract 2 from 57 to get 55 for e5. You can plot it out on a graph. You can also do the moves for rooks and knights and bishop and queens. Pawn capture, en passent. I have not gone too far into it. I don't see much purpose for it except maybe for a chess program. I really just wanted to say chess is math when I was taking a math course at college. Let me know what you guys think.
Not everything with numbers is math.
A knight looks like the number 68, a king looks like the number 69, a queen looks like the number 70, a pawn looks like a tomato, a bishop looks like the number 43774934883, and a rook looks like the number -1. This is how math is related to chess.
Very common mistake though. When I went to do my mathematics degree it was in an age where calculators were rare and expensive things. I contacted the university to ask what calculator they used for the course. They replied it was a mathematics degree so why would you need a calculator. More about ideas than numbers. To wind me up, my old teacher bubbly would say here comes the head of sums.
how are those 2 are related
I believe we established above that they are second cousins on their mother's side.
I don't know how many maths lectures or chess Congress's you have been to lately but I think it's the fathers side
This seems to make no sense. 1. e4 = 54 = 52+2, right? In that case, black playing e4 at some point is also 54 because 55-1=54. What if tyhe queen moves to e4? Is this still 54? If one were to add the piece value to the equation, such as giving a knight +3, then Ne1 = 54. Therefore there is no way to show what moves where, meaning your current system denotes nothing. There are other problems. How about 37... Nfd5? How about Qa1 - Qh8? Your system has nothing to include moving across files, designating pieces, captures, and special descriptors such as check.
The idea of a graph illustrates nothing. Graphs are a visual representation of data. Your system will require two graphs since black also moves. Therefore, soon as black plays 1... e5, they are shown as having a higher number on the graph than white, giving us an asymmetrical graph to represent a symmetrical chessboard. Another option would to have a negative graph for black, but now we're back to descriptive notation. The more important flaw in the graph is that is represents nothing on the chessboard. It does nothing to show the strength of the position, or event he position itself.
What JoyofSatan neglected to mention is that he's using international correspondence chess code.
The way to read it is instead of letters for the files, they receive numbers. And the ranks also have number. Files appear first, so e2 is represented by 52. e4 is represented by 54. 53 would be e3. The normal way to write 1.e4 in such a system is 5254. The advantage of this system is that it does not depend on any letters. Rf1 means Rook to f1 in English, but K to f1 in French.
1.Nf3 would appear as 7163 (g1-f3).
by ChessPatzer987 a few minutes ago
by RKiDZ 10 minutes ago
What I've Learned From Playing Chess
by Goram 11 minutes ago
18th Century Chess Rules
by ChessPatzer987 14 minutes ago
9/4/2015 - Just In Time
by DreamKenya 14 minutes ago
What is the first opening I should learn for white?
by ylblai2 45 minutes ago
11/19/2007 - Open the File!
by pavlos05 50 minutes ago
Doubt On the Use of Computers
by btickler 65 minutes ago
The Carlsbad Whatseewhodunit?
by cyclopps 71 minutes ago
Playing 1. e4 as White
by PhantomCapablanca 77 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!