17459 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If you're good at chess, you most likely have a mathematical mind.
I don't entirely agree with your statement, I think it would be more accurate to say "if you're good at chess, there is a strong possibility you have a reasonable grasp of logical truth and memory..", that is simply by making an observation of master level players.
Kasparov oncce alluded to an experiment in germany.
Two groups of students of similar strength - were enrolled in the same math class. one group was also taught chess principles.
When the exam was taken, the group with the chess lessons clearly did better in the same meth test.
The video is on youtube where kasparov speaks about the virtues of chess (low cost, improves analytical skills etc) and pushes to popularise it in schools
The video is on youtube where kasparov speaks about the virtues of chess (low cost,
improves analytical skills etc) and pushes to popularise it in schools
Thing is there are a lot of other ways to improve analytical skills that are more direct, and therefore usually mor effective.
Btw, when I opened this thread I saw this ad next to it:
Interestingly, I've never seen this ad on chess.com before. Is it a conicidence that it's on this thread?
And now that I look at the problem again, I suddenly realized that it's not a valid problem. In the original ad there was a space after "5 +," and you were supposed to fill it out. Which I just realized is impossible with just the information given.
Even if something were plugged into that space, it is still unsolvable, being one equation with two unknowns.
3 variables & 1 equation.
That's why you need to go to their website and pay lots of money!
by AarshTrivedi96 a few minutes ago
1/25/2015 - Mate in 2
by SaiKrishna_K a few minutes ago
A simple retractor problem
by Crazychessplaya a few minutes ago
GM Negi's 1.e4 books appropriate for class players?
by chessmicky 3 minutes ago
how can I report when I think my opponent used a programm?
by rowlem 5 minutes ago
Can someone analyze this?
by casual_chess_yo 6 minutes ago
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 fxe5 ?
by casual_chess_yo 9 minutes ago
smallest checkmate possible ever
by owltuna 9 minutes ago
Tata Steel 2015
by incantevoleutopia 9 minutes ago
Won after trash talking after queen blunder
by casual_chess_yo 11 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!