11072 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
So apparently people say rapid games are just tactics... and strategy is really minimal... but then people also say tactics flow from a superior position..... so doesn't that contradict?
"Rapid" is technically 25 minute, but it is the same. It is true that most games at 10, 15, or 25 minute are won on tactics, it is because one side overlooked a simple threat, not because of some inherent advantage.
In fact, fast chess cuts the time for calculation, which is important for complicated tactics, so you will score better by playing with proper strategy for the structure while your opponent lets his time tick away looking for tactics that aren't there.
so are you saying strategy is important? it seems in the first half of your post you imply strategy isn't important, but then in the 2nd half you suggest the opposite.
im considering not even bothering reading the middle game books i have (reasses your chess, my system) and just spending all my chess studying time on tactics problems
I thought that all the moves that don't directly relate to tactics are considered strategical moves.
And whenever I think stuff like: "Now I shall concentrate my pieces on the King side and then push it down" or "I have a passed pawn, now let's try to force the opponent to sacrifice a piece to kill it" that kinda counts to strategy.
And since I certainly think stuff like that in my usual 15|10's I cannot really agree on the topic.
I mean "Development", "Pawn-Structure", "Outposts", "Space-Advantage", "King Safety" that's all strategic and certainly gets considered by most players even in shorter time-controls.
Nicely played game
by Kwisatz01 a few minutes ago
Who is better Paul Morphy or Magnus Carlsen
by 55dipk555 6 minutes ago
Top Five Female Chess Players of All-Time
by Polar_Bear 9 minutes ago
Chess.com is wasting my vacation time
by Jv40 12 minutes ago
by wu1010 22 minutes ago
I need your Help Australians!
by BrendanJNorman 30 minutes ago
9/2/2014 - Mate in 2 Again
by sikkaarshin 35 minutes ago
blitz/bullet rating is the only thing that matters in internet chess
by Pulpofeira 36 minutes ago
World Chess.com Correspondence Chess Championship Match (MSC157 vs. windmill64)
by MSC157 42 minutes ago
can we say caruana is stronger then carlsen now
by fabelhaft 49 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!