18495 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
of course vote chess is fun, but does it really help u work ur mind?
post ur opinions here!
Vote chess has the option of talking and discussing before the move.
One of many ways of doing it
Talking of vote chess; thread feed back.
Do you talk, or just vote?
I don't see how any move analysis and discussion wouldn't help.
I don't that or math26
^This. In the bigger games/groups you have titled players commenting and having to justify the reasoning behind their moves. What could be better?
I dont think it helps
it depends, if you are active in the VC and are posting variations and some one else is arguing against you saying that another move is better then it is good. If you just do a move without looking at the comments then it is bad.
Yeah... you're right
Vote chess is consultation chess. If you are just voting without reading what others say, there will be little improvement.
If you actively discuss your plans with other players in a vote chess game, vote chess is an excellent tool for helping to hone analysis, discover weaknesses in evaluation, and learn new openings.
Vote chess, like so much in life, is as good as you want to make it.
I don't know if people can see our comments (white), but for me it's definitely a learning experience.
I wouldn't write it better.
@Scottrf : non group members can see moves via the archive only once the game is finished (which is the case here).
Enjoyed that particular game. No stealth voting and almost all group members involved in discussion.
Some teams suck at vote chess, some teams cheat at vote chess, some teams blindly follow what better/titled players suggest.
Very rarely do you get groups where there is really discussion and debate.
I'm lucky to be part of one such group, Budapest Gambiteers, if all vote chess was played like this it would be an amazing learning experience.
VC games can be a good way for patzers like myself to learn and improve. But, you have to participate on a team where others discuss every move and are serious about it. If not, you are wasting your time. And associating yourself with high rated players is a definate plus, also.
The hard part is finding a Vote Chess team that WILL take the time to discuss ideas during the game.
"Battle of the Legends: Kasparov Vs. Short"
Should I start playing a new opening
by wrathss a few minutes ago
4/26/2015 - Mate in 2
by archieg9 3 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by but 4 minutes ago
My Best win
by Onarres24 4 minutes ago
Moving a Pawn Twice in the Opening
by ponz111 10 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "Kasparov - Short 2015"
by pdela 12 minutes ago
New playwers beware
by Vanrayneman 17 minutes ago
anyone wanting to get friends
by gssleader 17 minutes ago
What's the best answer to white's e4 opening?
by candyass4ever 17 minutes ago
Chance to play a NM!
by shakedaspear 19 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!