Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Estimation on your ELO Rating test


  • 8 months ago · Quote · #21

    apostolis1

    I 've done this test some months ago, and my rating was 1968 or something like that !

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #22

    real_tzs

    I looked up these positions in the free ICOfY Base game database of 5 million games.

    1. Spassky vs. Tal, 1973, and two others.
    2. Fischer vs. Panno, 1970.
    3. Yudasin vs. Georgiev, 1990.
    4. NOT FOUND.
    5. Osnos vs. Dely, 1965.
    6. Veresov vs. Buslaev, 1963.
    7. 77 different games, including these from 1959: Olafsson vs. Gligoric, Tal vs. Fischer, Petrosian vs. Gligoric, and another Tal vs. Fischer.
    8. Stein vs. Bilek, 1967.
    9. NOT FOUND.
    10. Johner vs. Nimzowitsch, 1926, and 10 others.

    Anyone with Chessbase or some other large database want to check 4 and 9?

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #23

    Puanli_Heyecan

    estimated as 1680.. my USCF rating is 1600..

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #24

    waffllemaster

    I remember taking this test about... 7-8 years ago or so.  I remember reasoning that in position 10 that Qd7 made the most sense.  Today though that move makes little sense to me and I don't know why it's considered best.  (Of course back then I probably chose it for the wrong reasons).

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #25

    Ferrar

    1915 too low

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #26

    watcha

    1865

    I made Simple Simon moves in most of the problems but somehow got two 2500 and a 2600 move right which raised my average...

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #27

    watcha

    waffllemaster wrote:

    I remember taking this test about... 7-8 years ago or so.  I remember reasoning that in position 10 that Qd7 made the most sense.  Today though that move makes little sense to me and I don't know why it's considered best.  (Of course back then I probably chose it for the wrong reasons).

    This left a question mark in me too... ( played Ba6 - thought it was logical move in a Nimzo-Indian system - it turned out to be an 1600 move ... ).

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #28

    TheGreatOogieBoogie

    Not count problem 10?!  Then my Ba6 won't be counted! =(

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #29

    Vo1d3mort

    Got 1670 there, my real FIDE ELO is ~1750, so it seems quite ok for a rough estimate.

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #30

    jel23

    ive got 1965 pretty consistent..

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #31

    jel23

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 8 months ago · Quote · #32

    jel23

    ive got 1965 pretty consistent...

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #33

    watcha

    jel23 wrote twice:

    ive got 1965 pretty consistent...

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #34

    Hohenzollern

    Hmm..  Funny that my score was almost exactly the same as my tactic rating in Chesstempo (Few points below 2000)

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #35

    watcha

    Hohenzollern wrote:

    Hmm..  Funny that my score was almost exactly the same as my tactic rating in Chesstempo (Few points below 2000)

    My best standard rating at Chesstempo was 1861 and made 1865 at the test: interesting coincidence here as well.

  • 8 months ago · Quote · #36

    Twinchicky

    I tried this a couple weeks back and got 1800-something... I guess that's how I play when I'm not blundering away games left and right.

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #37

    SpicyJalapeno

    MasterDuffer wrote:

    Up to 1595.

    ur bad at chess i did random awnsers and got 1643 really got 2343

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #38

    Thanatos_01

    1650 !

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #39

    Dude_3

    test confirmed accurate, got 1930

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #40

    NicoloPags

    1460, which is 200 points behind my OTB and 300 below my chess.com 


Back to Top

Post your reply: