chess has changed a lot over the past several decades
just finished reading kasparovs 'revolution in the 70's' and was thinking about what has evolved in the time since then such as advances in chess software and its availability and ubiquity being one such branch of chess that has really evolved quickly
we have certainly witnessed things such as the death and rebirth of the grunfeld at high levels (killed by karpov-kasparov, revived by anand-gelfand)
what other transitional fossils have we to look at in this evolutionary process of chess over the past 40 or so years?
chess has changed a lot over the past several decades
just finished reading kasparovs 'revolution in the 70's' and was thinking about what has evolved in the time since then such as advances in chess software and its availability and ubiquity being one such branch of chess that has really evolved quickly
we have certainly witnessed things such as the death and rebirth of the grunfeld at high levels (killed by karpov-kasparov, revived by anand-gelfand)
what other transitional fossils have we to look at in this evolutionary process of chess over the past 40 or so years?