12134 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
With the rating floor dropping (originally 2200, then 2000 for a while, now 1000) there will naturally be rating deflation as the weaker players improve, taking rating points from the stronger players. This was not a problem when the floor was 2000 as far fewer players were improving at that rate. The deflation started at lower levels (below 2000), but now it seems to have spread to the top level. You can view the past top players lists here- http://ratings.fide.com/toplist.phtml
I made a graph of the rating of the #100 player for the last 3 years. Here it is.
This seems to indicate rating deflation around the 2650 mark, and at the 2700 mark inflation has stopped. I expect we will see deflation at the 2700 mark soon.
There wasn't a problem with inflation (in fact it was good, leading to things like Carlsen's record rating getting attention) But we will only be getting more lower-rated players, and thus deflation. Now this will be very bad for chess when, for example, Carlsen keeps improving but stops going up, and chess players appear to be getting weaker.
So do you think FIDE should do something about this before it's too late? If nothing is done I expect there to be less than ten 2700+ players in ten years time. Which would not be good.
It's only a problem because people simply cannot comprehend the simple fact that elo rating does not directly correspond to playing strength.
Indeed. But it's the best indicator there is. I think the problem is comparing ratings from different time peroids, like comparing Bobby Fischer's 2785 to 2785 today.
It's not possible to compare objectively, only speculate. Although as engines get even stronger more objective analysis of playing strength will be possible, but even now the strongest engines can't really accurately evaluate alot of say, Carlsen's moves, which proves that you can't accurately measure the playing strength of very high level players purely through engine analysis. It's hard to say whether or not Fischer's play when he reached 2785 would have earned him a higher rating today, I'm inclined to think it would have based on my assessment of his games vs the games of current superGMs of similar rating, but obviously that is still only a subjective judgement.
How fide know my rating
Actually, ELO rating tracks playing strength extremely well. In fact, it is the best predictor of the result. Why would you think otherwise?
That is not the point I think. It's more like ''you get a black belt if you can perform action X.'' In chess, there is no objective way to test playing strength. For example, if you took tactical puzzles, then someone like John Nunn could be world champion or something.
It only measures strength relative to the pool of players within the same elo group. Yes it is a good predictor of a result, but there is no way of measuring, for example, whether or not Bobby Fischer's 2785 is equivalent to the same elo rating today, because the pool of players is different.
I think it is kind of silly to have lowered the FIDE rating to a 1000 floor. In my opinion FIDE rating floor should be 2000 when players who achieve a FIDE rating are most likely serious chess players who are trying to become chess professionals and international tournament players. National ratings can take care of the lower ranked players and those who might be fairly strong players but have no desire to become professionals and play internationally.
After Ruy Lopez
by Shakaali a few minutes ago
by viperone a few minutes ago
5/21/2013 - The Power of Imagination
by my04 a few minutes ago
What is the proper response to "gg"?
by Likar 3 minutes ago
by madhacker 4 minutes ago
Questions About Chess Software
by MultiDimensionalMe 8 minutes ago
1339 vs 1400
by Irontiger 12 minutes ago
by DAVID_CARRUTHERS 12 minutes ago
3 reasons Why "Online Chess" ratings deserves no repsect
by YeOldeWildman 14 minutes ago
What is your favorite opening?
by SirBenjamin 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2013 Chess.com