19633 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
With the rating floor dropping (originally 2200, then 2000 for a while, now 1000) there will naturally be rating deflation as the weaker players improve, taking rating points from the stronger players. This was not a problem when the floor was 2000 as far fewer players were improving at that rate. The deflation started at lower levels (below 2000), but now it seems to have spread to the top level. You can view the past top players lists here- http://ratings.fide.com/toplist.phtml
I made a graph of the rating of the #100 player for the last 3 years. Here it is.
This seems to indicate rating deflation around the 2650 mark, and at the 2700 mark inflation has stopped. I expect we will see deflation at the 2700 mark soon.
There wasn't a problem with inflation (in fact it was good, leading to things like Carlsen's record rating getting attention) But we will only be getting more lower-rated players, and thus deflation. Now this will be very bad for chess when, for example, Carlsen keeps improving but stops going up, and chess players appear to be getting weaker.
So do you think FIDE should do something about this before it's too late? If nothing is done I expect there to be less than ten 2700+ players in ten years time. Which would not be good.
It's only a problem because people simply cannot comprehend the simple fact that elo rating does not directly correspond to playing strength.
Indeed. But it's the best indicator there is. I think the problem is comparing ratings from different time peroids, like comparing Bobby Fischer's 2785 to 2785 today.
How fide know my rating
Actually, ELO rating tracks playing strength extremely well. In fact, it is the best predictor of the result. Why would you think otherwise?
That is not the point I think. It's more like ''you get a black belt if you can perform action X.'' In chess, there is no objective way to test playing strength. For example, if you took tactical puzzles, then someone like John Nunn could be world champion or something.
I think it is kind of silly to have lowered the FIDE rating to a 1000 floor. In my opinion FIDE rating floor should be 2000 when players who achieve a FIDE rating are most likely serious chess players who are trying to become chess professionals and international tournament players. National ratings can take care of the lower ranked players and those who might be fairly strong players but have no desire to become professionals and play internationally.
The Dynamic Sicilian - Which Dragon?
by clarapca a few minutes ago
Could you beat Morphy if he gave you knight odds?
by SilentKnighte5 a few minutes ago
losing on time
by millionairesdaughter a few minutes ago
Gligorić vs. Tal vs. Dubrovnik II
by cgrau 2 minutes ago
Outcome of de la Maza's Seven Circles Program
by SilentKnighte5 4 minutes ago
1000 Worst Places to Play Chess
by LemonTree123 4 minutes ago
3/30/2015 - Mate in 3
by pbazan 5 minutes ago
Openings with queen side castling?
by shine5 6 minutes ago
Podium Prediction Plus (PPP) - "US Chess Champs 2015"
by amitesh123 8 minutes ago
by kstorn 9 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!