12798 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ruby-Fischer
I think Kasparov would have`won easily
tokyojim79
It's just impossible to tell. They would have had to play each other not just once but many times for us to judge who was better. Even then, it may be hard to tell because some players just don't get along against certain others, even though they are absolutely brilliant in general. For example, Tal was an amazing player but struggled against Korchnoi. They would have had to play in the same era for an extented period of time with chess theory at the same level of advancement and the same access to resources against the same opponents for us to know for sure.
pdve
they have different styles but i tend to think kasparov would come out better. his ability to spot combinations is terrifying.
Valek's Immortal
by Master_Valek a few minutes ago
Agressive Chess Openings
by LewisSkolnick a few minutes ago
The Opening
by Kirby64 a few minutes ago
Youtube Chess Videos
by Frittles 3 minutes ago
HELP, Game Abandoned!
by ChessPlayer6033 5 minutes ago
Membership Auto Renewal
by Cogwheel 5 minutes ago
5/25/2013 - Pieces Out of Play
by Wikinger 6 minutes ago
Is it possible that there are psychic chess masters?
by Irontiger 6 minutes ago
Live Chess help
by Suvel_Karmarkar 8 minutes ago
The Queens Gambit Trap for Black!!
by sutpan 12 minutes ago