12287 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Ruby-Fischer
I think Kasparov would have`won easily
tokyojim79
It's just impossible to tell. They would have had to play each other not just once but many times for us to judge who was better. Even then, it may be hard to tell because some players just don't get along against certain others, even though they are absolutely brilliant in general. For example, Tal was an amazing player but struggled against Korchnoi. They would have had to play in the same era for an extented period of time with chess theory at the same level of advancement and the same access to resources against the same opponents for us to know for sure.
pdve
they have different styles but i tend to think kasparov would come out better. his ability to spot combinations is terrifying.
Is it possible that there are psychic chess masters
by trysts a few minutes ago
"Boring"? Not on your life!
by MSC157 2 minutes ago
5/24/2013 - Winning With Technique
by 3943rjfrolland 3 minutes ago
5,000 Signs You Don't Know Enough About Chess
by ClavierCavalier 3 minutes ago
Post your best miniatures here
by ClavierCavalier 8 minutes ago
The Halasz Gambit 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.f4
by royalbishop 11 minutes ago
Chess puzzle question
by Justin448 11 minutes ago
Concerned about trolling, again
by Ubik42 13 minutes ago
Where is IM Pfren???
by StrategicPlay 13 minutes ago
Chess Gizmos and Gadgets
by dtrasatti 14 minutes ago