14535 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The OP is back. What a coincidence. He left just before S.S. came here, and he re-appears just after she left.
...well spotted....worth a thought...
He posted in her, "tough to be a girl thread" post 1233
Kasprov jr gets it. Welcome to reality.
I also love how the girls pretend they hate it as if that wasn't their intention.
By his reasoning, if I get a gun, go to the zoo, and shoot all the animals, that isn't my fault and doesn't count as animal cruelty, because humans have been conditioned by evolution to kill animals for food.
Indeed, it depends on how determinist you want to get about this :) "Don't punish me, I can't control who I am!"
And actually I'm not sure if it's easy to resolve this issue -- how far can you go to rid yourself of responsibility. After all, if you're mentally insane for instance you are treated more leniently. My intuition tells me that somehow, at some extreme, the argument has to break down (yet it's not easy to see the "how").
I have a thought on this idea.
I don't care how insane you are, or how unwitingly you do it. If someone was to go on a killing spree for example, I do not care if they are aware of what they are doing, they should be capped.
If you are a theif, I don't care if you can control it or not, you should be punished.
If someone fights you, you don't say "well thats your instinct so its okay"
Can't stand the mamby pamby well little johnny has this so its okay no matter what he does.
Actions speak for themselves, and controlable or not, all actions have consequences
ahahahahahahahah so stupid
What about ladies like Ashley Tapp? Will she be the "next" Magnus Carlsen...
holy crap fine as hell, need to match her asap
It is also possible that most of people here are actually women who pretend to be males and those males who harrass women (5% or something) are the only ´true males` here.
This seems likely.
me sacaron de la zona de juego
by nemross 5 minutes ago
Luck in Chess
by satanichess 11 minutes ago
by batgirl 14 minutes ago
Quick question (players rated above 2000)
by hayabusahayate16 16 minutes ago
If Fischer would played Karpov for the World Champion, who would win?
by JamieDelarosa 17 minutes ago
Is it possible that there are still good openings that remain unexplored?
by stuzzicadenti 29 minutes ago
What is the best move here? Where do I move knight?
by Bobby-J-Fischer 32 minutes ago
What to Study
by Robert0905 33 minutes ago
Faking a LOW rating to win !!
by slimcheffy 37 minutes ago
Thoughts on 1.Nc3
by Heathcliffe256 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!