17631 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Is it ok to use a comp to analyze or opening books references in these types of online correspondence chess.
Only books. Nothing else. No computer, no friends, nothing. Only books!!
books and databases
no engines. no assistance from friends/coaches/others. everything else is permitted.
Here's the relevant points from the official rules (available here):
Yes. That too! :-)
THIS database isn't allowed. Am I right?
Even though it includes engine evaluations, the organization is that of a database, it isn't actually doing any calculating live, so it should be okay.
Only endgame databases are prohibited, because they show computer-verified best play.
I don't think, it makes a difference whether the engine evaluation is done "live" or not. It's help with a computer evaluation, and that's definitely not good.
THIS DB isn't allowed (or shouldn't be in case chess.com hasn't prohibited it): Nalimov Endgame Tables have solved ALL endgames with 6 or less pieces (note: pawns and Kings are counted as "pieces" too) Other clubs have banned them from CC or online use in games.
As far as the "other" DB goes I don't understand what the BFD about "engine" evaluations is, all books are allowed and BCO, MCO, ECO, NCO, opening manuals etc all have "human" evaluations which are superior to engine evaluations IMHO and where does everybody who worships engine evaluations think they came from? The engines? No, the engines are making evaluations based on whatever was programmed into them - by old-fashioned carbon-based chess engines relying on primitive neurons and synapses instead of CPUs and RAM.
why isn't botvinnik talked about as much
by TheGreatOogieBoogie 5 minutes ago
who likes who in staafff the most staff the ko
by Fresh_from_the_Oven 5 minutes ago
11/28/2014 - Inch By Inch
by marsuplami 6 minutes ago
by pfren 6 minutes ago
A not-so-simple mate in 2
by chaotic_iak 7 minutes ago
how much logic was behind tal's sacrafices
by yeres30 8 minutes ago
sexism in chess?
by Elubas 9 minutes ago
Nakamura explains chess
by Addicted-to-Chess97 10 minutes ago
Carlsen's next opponent in the WCC match
by CrazyJae 11 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by Ziryab 12 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!