11656 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I started playing chess a few weeks ago and I got Fritz 13. I am wondering if when you put it in "Handicap and Fun" mode, if the "playing strength" is equivalent to Elo ratings? According to this pdf http://www.chesscafe.com/text/lopez08.pdf it says the "playing strength" is an approximite Elo, but I am wondering if that is still accurate.
Emphasis on approximate. There is no program that simulates human play, so really the ratings aren't accurate. When you handicap the program it still orders all the legal moves from best to worst, the only difference is it will choose bad or less than great moves at random points in the game.
For example it may find a really good tactical move one moment then throw away some material the next move.
I was wondering because I have only been playing a few weeks and I the last several times I have beat it and it was set at 1800. The last game I took its queen in 14 moves, without losing any of my own pieces. I thought 1800 was a high Elo so I assumed that the playing strength must not be accurate, since I only started playing a few weeks ago.
Edit: now I also beat it at 2225 with the careless preset. I'm guessing the playing strength isn't accurate for the handicap mode. Does anyone else play Fritz handicap mode, and can you estimate a rough conversion to real Elo scores?
Indeed, the higher you set the elo, the stronger Fritz plays on Handicap and Fun, but at 1800 or 2000 (or higher) it makes silly tactical or positional errors which a human player at that level would not make. Play it that way and practice taking advantage of those mistakes or learn where you went wrong by playing back over the game with Fritz set on Infinite Analysis and be surprised at your own oversights.
6/18/2015 - Paul Keres vs. Verbak, corres, 1932
by turkhuu_5 3 minutes ago
Some uneducated moderator has removed my content
by kleelof 4 minutes ago
6/27/2015 - M.Tal - R.Dzidzichashvili, 1991
by bluebird21 4 minutes ago
Chess.com users should be REQUIRED to use REAL NAMES.
by tkbunny 4 minutes ago
Beating a grandmaster or an international master...
by ChessOptimist 6 minutes ago
Why Not 2. NC3??
by Fiveofswords 7 minutes ago
by Jion_Wansu 7 minutes ago
by yeres30 10 minutes ago
Should chess be considered a sport?
by wolverine96 12 minutes ago
Hurt/Heal World Chess Champions
by rcmacmillan 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!