8400 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
RegicidalManiac
I dont play live very often, and I have always figured if someone is so concerned about their internet rating that they have to cheat, then all is better for me. I get better competition from their chess engine, and they do not learn how to get better, so if I ever meet that person at a tournament I will be much more likely to win!!
erikido23
COuple of things. Quality, not quantity. You don't need to study 4-8 hours a day. You need AT LEAST an hour of FOCUSED and DIRECTED(as in not just random practice. It must be directed at improving on something specific).
If after an hour of training you aren't mentally tired you probably aren't working hard enough. Remember you need to be 1% better everyday and if you are not mentally tired then you are not getting better.
Last thing- don't let people tell you you can't do it.
Ziryab
I dont understand what manipulating lag means?? Or how a cheater can have only a 1600-1800, or even 2000 rating?? wouldn't a cheater have a much higher rating? It would not seem like they are using a very good engine to be that low rated.
I don't fully understand it, but one method described to me by an administrator at another site involves intentionally creating short disconnections--short enough to be perceived by the server as lag, rather than disconnects.
Andre_Harding
To me, online ratings mean absolutely zero. So, don't even try to compare them to a real rating.
I play on ICC, but I do so for practicing certain aspects of my game, and don't worry about the rating that much. My rating there is a little lower than my real rating, but I know many people around my same real rating whose ICC ratings are hundreds of points higher or lower than their real ratings. I'm talking about for all time controls, by the way.
As for making master...why not? This idea that a person either has or doesn't have what it takes is not giving the whole picture. When I first started playing tournaments 15 years ago I was a very weak player already in middle school. And believe me, I was not talented...plenty of people in New York City would tell you that. You know what is the key factor to getting where you want to get to? You must keep improving.
This improvement doesn't need to be steady, and it doesn't need to be consistent. But, over a long period of time, you need to improve. Eventually you will find yourself reaching higher and higher.
As for myself, to illustrate:
I reached 1000 USCF afer my first year of tournaments.
I reached 1400 USCF after my next year of tournaments.
I reached 1600 USCF after another 1.5 years.
I reached 1800 USCF after a further 4.5 years.
I reached 2000 USCF after a further ~5 years.
I have been 2000 USCF since December 2008, still working hard.
So it took me more than 12.5 years to reach USCF Expert. But you know what? I'm not done yet
Has the whole experience been frustrating? Hell yeah. But I constantly take in new ideas and ways to view chess. I would say that I didn't start to understand chess (even a little) until the summer of 2008. I have the knowledge of a master (and even more) but my practical play is not consistenly master-level yet. Once the lightbulb goes on fully, I will reach master.
As others have said, don't ever let anyone tell you that you can't do it. Because you CAN do it, if it's that important to you. It doesn't matter WHY you want to achieve your goal, it doesn't need to make sense...if YOU want to achieve this goal, you can make it happen. Just take a hard look at what parts of your game you do badly and work on them, but when you play tournaments accentuate your strengths. Don't fight against YOUR CHESS--something I did for far too many years.
nxavar
It looks like you started playing and studing chess at a very young age. Your case is no surprise, actually there are a lot who have goten much farther than you. It would be a surprise nontheless to see that happening for an adult.
kdl88
Two words: Dream on. Very few people have what it takes to make master strength.
...says the non-master.
I wouldn't call 12, going on 13, a young age to begin playing chess seriously.
And why a surprise for an adult? I went to high school, college, and then entered the workforce. It's not like I have unlimited time to work on chess. I just make it a priority to give much of my free time to it. THAT is what most people won't do.
themothman
You want to be one of the best chess players? Why would it not be possible?
edit: I'm not saying you should set your mind to it, I just disagree with some posters that are basically saying it's not possible.
A Very Serious Game
by AlCzervik 2 minutes ago
Which gambit gives you the most innitiative?
by TheBigDecline 4 minutes ago
Setting Engines to never resign
by ollave 10 minutes ago
Weird bugs on this site.
by kco 11 minutes ago
King's Gambit a good opening?
by TitanCG 16 minutes ago
Looking for Omega Chess set
by kco 17 minutes ago
A recent game
by Timothy_P 22 minutes ago
Shredder12UCI: left thinking for 9 hours after 1.e4 gave a sequence. Interested?
by FirebrandX 26 minutes ago
From a real game: What is Black's Best Move #2
by didnthandlethetruth 26 minutes ago
most obscure but awesome and useful opening
by Fear_ItseIf 28 minutes ago