11221 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Well, I must admit I'm a bit confused. Unless I'm misreading it or something, according to your home page your rating is 770...
Yeah. Honestly I don't understand ratings that low... what separates a 500 from a 700 from a 1000 besides they're old enough to sit and pay attention. I don't see any chess related skill separating these ratings... so don't include them in adult events unless they're rated something like 1100-1200 or higher. If they're below that just start them out as unrated.
I've seen tables with kids rated 300 (even 100). I don't even know what that means. Obviously the parents drive them out to sit in front of a chess board for a few hours and the kid is bored out of their mind, makes a few random moves, eats a snack, then their parents drive them home. I don't get it...
I got paired with one girl who was rated something like 500. Apparently she only came along for the ride, her brother was playing and rated 1800, so it was like a family trip or something. But I basically missed a round because there was no day care option so the parents entered the sister too. So I got to baby sit for about an hour and then wait around for round 2.
i think u still in group B
Isn't he rated 1039 USCF? Maybe I looked up the wrong person. I think you need to consistently solve tactical puzzles, try 20 a day or if it is better for you 20 minutes a day. I find that daily study of something helps me much more than intense study followed by near to no study for a period of time. Going over your losses was a great suggested several made too. The nice part about where we are at in playing strength is that we have a much easier time identifying and correcting our play and one little correction or improvement can go a long way in increasing our playing strength. Good luck in your improvements. :)
There are several threads here, all of which I think are valid. As a former teacher, recognizing that everyone has his/her own learning style (auditory, visual, tactile, etc.), I doubt there is one "magic bullet" that kills every plateau.
If I had to pick one single factor, it would be to play over your own losses. We often hear advice to work on weaknesses, and any loss is due to a weakness or error so your own lost games are self-defining.
But study alone isn't worth much unless you can determine what the weakness really is. And that involves familiarity with openings, tactics, position and endgame skills.
So which comes first, the chicken or the egg? You build up chess "memory" and instinct by repetition which increases your speed in recognizing a weakness and decreases your analytical time. This is why better players can play a blitz game accurately, if not well. Repetition builds pattern recognition.
The whole thing comes full circle, and the better players are those who have the self-discipline to work on the things they don't like to work on. Put another way, successful players are those who are willing to do the things that lesser players are unwilling to do (assuming equal ability).
I improved my endgameknowledge, which also added to my confidence. (Also Tactics are always usefull)
Great Thread, thanks for the advices.
"Is Bobby Fischer the Greatest?"
by JPRace a few minutes ago
Does anyone want to be a Great Chess Player?
by pilotk9 a few minutes ago
What percentage of chess is tactics
by Venus-rat-trap a few minutes ago
1/30/2015 - White Draws
by TheBish a few minutes ago
i suck soooooo bad
by wanmokewan 5 minutes ago
i bet people with membership have lower ratings than people who don't
by pilotk9 13 minutes ago
Would you expect a mathematician to make a better chess player than an artist?
by leiph18 13 minutes ago
4 years to become a chess master
by Boldchess 16 minutes ago
Fu ck youself
by kaynight 17 minutes ago
How did you choose your username?
by kaynight 18 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!