17036 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Does anyone know what the range of inaccuracy rate (as assessed by computer) is for GMs? My understanding is that they are present in almost all games, but I have no idea whether they occur a few or many times in a typical game.
I am curious to know how the frequency of inaccuracies (and mistakes and blunders too) vary with FIDE rating.
Not sure what you implied by "rate" here. There are far too many parameters to tweak to determine a "what is an inaccuracy" via a chess engine.
For example, if you let Houdini spend 10 seconds per move on a decent i3 laptop analyzing a GM vs. GM game, you'd see inaccuracies as shown in the eval. graph below:
(where the Y-axis is the engine evaluation score, X being the moves)
One could argue that ALL of Capa's "down-slope" shifts are inaccuracies. In other words, any time the GM deviated from what an engine deemed best was inaccurate?
Is this what you implied?
If you compared this to an eval. graph of two intermediate (1400-1600) players playing each other, you'd have something like this:
Here the # of big up/down slopes signify far more than just plain inaccuracies ... it is blunder city!
It would be cool if somebody statistically analyzed all the games in a GM megabase to see who were the most accurate/inaccurate were ... though I imagine that is a tough task to perform given that it would be hard to "standardize" the results for a given combination of engine + hardware + analysis parameters.
Have you seen this?
Insightful post. I agree the precise evaluations would depend on the setup, and in any case each player will vary according to whether he or she is having a good day - but I think there would still be enough data to fit a trend line and estimate roughly how (and how well) accuracy correlates with FIDE rating.
Yes, that is very interesting! It's exactly the kind of analysis I had in mind. I wonder if the authors have continued their investigations.
Also see this.
Shivsky's graph has more to do with an engine's progression of how it sees the game than it has to do with the accuracy of the actual moves that are played, right? After 1. e4 e5, a typical engine will already have spurted out evaluation numbers ranging from -0.10 to +0.30. Does that change the accuracy of the two halfmoves e2-e4 and e7-e5?
Heinzie made an excellent point ... those graphs just happened to be what my engine + hardware coughed up giving it an arbitrary amount of time / position.
If today's engine evaluation was infalliable, all engine vs. engine games would logically be drawn (or so says Game Theory!)
At best, one can measure "fuzzy" levels of "move" accuracy or inaccuracy with them....though it is valid to re-package these statistics as :
"According to Houdini on a Quad Core machine spending 10 minutes per move .... Grand Master A is more accurate than Grand Master B" and so on.
Nothing wrong with that and I'd love to see stats like this ... though what is truly "accurate" is something that requires chess to be solved.
"2015 European Individual Championship Round 9 Hosts GM Alon Greenfeld and GM Alik Gershon"
1000 Worst Places to Play Chess
by Rambo2004 a few minutes ago
3/5/2015 - E.Stoddard vs S.Sorenson, corr., 1977
by DA-NINJA-15 a few minutes ago
by Litwitlou 2 minutes ago
Query: players that employ cheap tactics
by Litwitlou 6 minutes ago
by Litwitlou 13 minutes ago
What should White do here? (A)1.Na4 (B)1.Rb1 (C) 1.Your choice?
by FrontyardProfessor 19 minutes ago
Spicy Openings for black
by LazG 21 minutes ago
real bug in chess.com
by Henkkamh 22 minutes ago
by Litwitlou 24 minutes ago
what tactic book help u get over that hump
by bgianis 27 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!