10694 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
engiens have change people way of thinkig which has lost my respect to the game there was a post invent a gambit that gives your side adventege and a person posted a stupid gambit just so he can laugh how people think about chess now days
I will add...
I do think that chessplayers used to have a greater sense of humility "back in the day". That's because when they sat across from someone, in the flesh, and got their butt kicked, that would bring the ego "down to earth".
Nowadays, everyone has a computer, smartphone, tablet, etc. with various software and some of the worst patzers can smugly feel like a whizzbang chessplayer.
Hey, I am just reporting the news.
you are absolutely right.leko was telling the same thing.
What is this belief based on?
Magnus Carlsen plays better than Houdini and Rybka when he go serious.I dont think their move analysis can be applied to Carlsen, it should be the other way around. Carlsen will tell us if Houdini made a good move.
no man I dont think so.Even carlsen makes mistakes.engines do not.
I think computers ruined the perception of the game and of what it takes to be a GM...I also think that and the internet raised the level of amateurs, club players and everyone else.I don't like the preparation players have now because of computers. It is like they are acting out somebody elses role. Yeah it did happen back then, but at least people played some moves that "could be ok", now they for sure know that they are ok or not...
I agree it has probably made people more stronger....but again it has destroyed romatic chess
I just find it annoying that if you're beating someone online, they can simply accuse you of using an engine and in their own mind they're still the greatest player in the world.
Not saying people don't cheat, just saying it partially ruins the satisfaction of winning if you win without any computer analysis.
Kings Gambit: Theory
by lolurspammed a few minutes ago
Most Comprehensive Ruy Lopez book?
by JRTK73 2 minutes ago
A not-so-simple mate in 2
by gwinner2 3 minutes ago
by jamesc1105 4 minutes ago
hughes death: how it will affect australia
by JRTK73 4 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by linuxblue1 5 minutes ago
1946 London chess gear (video)
by Jack_Burton 6 minutes ago
11/27/2014 - Mate in 4
by tangdavid 6 minutes ago
by Feufollet 7 minutes ago
Smith-Morra Countergambit / Blackmar Diemer Countergambit.
by JrxRippersRevenge 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!