10223 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Lets not talk about GMs, chess programs have raised the playing of ALL players in the past 10 years. I know it is a fact that a 1700 player today is like 1900 or 2000 player just 10 years ago. The average standard has gone up a lot. Try playing 1300 players on Yahoo Chess now......very different from your average 1300 player here.
I second this. I only dip into OTB chess on occasions, but I have been doing it on and off since the 70's I have always been rated in the 1600's. But my playing strength is definetly stronger now. I can look back at games I played in say 1979, as a 1600, and chuckle at the newbie mistakes. I would estimate I was playing at what would be considered 1400 today.
I don't think a chess program/ engine running on a smart phone can beat Carlsen and other 2700+ players yet. On a cheapest notebook, yes. But another few years, the smart phone can challenge the world champion anytime.
iphone 5s with 64bitprocessor engine can beat i believe
64 bit micro on a smart phone? Must be a pocket chess monster.
engiens have change people way of thinkig which has lost my respect to the game there was a post invent a gambit that gives your side adventege and a person posted a stupid gambit just so he can laugh how people think about chess now days
Overall, I'd say that chess is both better and worse than "in the old days".
There was more of a profound, mystique quality about chess back then. As a teenager, I had a job after school. Then, late at night, I'd read a library chess book with a flashlight and mini chess set on the upper bunk bed that I shared with my kid brother below.
Today? Well, we all know that what I said is out the window. I would no longer need the library, the book, the flashlight nor the mini chess set.
If I was in that situation today, I'd be practicing my tactics here on the internet with my backlit-screened Nexus and playing people all over the world.
I think I'd go with things the way they are. I happen to be an old guy who is not stuck in the past. I've always loved innovation and new technology. And, here we are!
The OP asked if respect for other people has changed.
You betcha. In the old days, if you disrespected someone...you could end up holding an icebag on your eye socket afterwards.
I will add...
I do think that chessplayers used to have a greater sense of humility "back in the day". That's because when they sat across from someone, in the flesh, and got their butt kicked, that would bring the ego "down to earth".
Nowadays, everyone has a computer, smartphone, tablet, etc. with various software and some of the worst patzers can smugly feel like a whizzbang chessplayer.
Hey, I am just reporting the news.
you are absolutely right.leko was telling the same thing.
What is this belief based on?
Magnus Carlsen plays better than Houdini and Rybka when he go serious.I dont think their move analysis can be applied to Carlsen, it should be the other way around. Carlsen will tell us if Houdini made a good move.
no man I dont think so.Even carlsen makes mistakes.engines do not.
I think computers ruined the perception of the game and of what it takes to be a GM...I also think that and the internet raised the level of amateurs, club players and everyone else.I don't like the preparation players have now because of computers. It is like they are acting out somebody elses role. Yeah it did happen back then, but at least people played some moves that "could be ok", now they for sure know that they are ok or not...
I agree it has probably made people more stronger....but again it has destroyed romatic chess
More than 50 years of chessplay.
Why do you ask?
I just find it annoying that if you're beating someone online, they can simply accuse you of using an engine and in their own mind they're still the greatest player in the world.
Not saying people don't cheat, just saying it partially ruins the satisfaction of winning if you win without any computer analysis.
en passant étiquette when opponent doesn't know about the rule
by verygoodman918 3 minutes ago
went from 1400 to 1700 in 1.5 months, it's easy!
by macer75 11 minutes ago
How to best continue this position?
by The_Ghostess_Lola 12 minutes ago
Can't access to live chess
by Sine-Nomine 15 minutes ago
Mate in 25
by premio53 16 minutes ago
7/13/2014 - Mate in 3
by ericliyuyang 20 minutes ago
Top 10 Chess Books to Own
by Sho2 21 minutes ago
Hurt/heal chess youtubers!
by ChezBoy 25 minutes ago
Free Chess Database
by pawpatrol 28 minutes ago
by Amethystical 29 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!