Forums

Help me Delete Threads?

Sort:
Lord-Chaos

please staff help me delete some threads. i just went on Demetrios's not working GM mate (inspired by Lasker), and i was saying how 1 Kg8 avoids the mate, but... the thread got deleted! so... if you can delete threads. HELP DELETE THIS ONE! Lots of people are saying delete this =D

http://www.chess.com/forum/view/chess-openings/hurtheal-1e4-openings?ncc=7#first_new_comment

Kacparov

I am!

sam0405

last.....?

Kacparov

Bring back the old times!!!!

nuclearturkey

The reason why they did it was that some people pointed out that the OP doesn't "own" the threads they start, so it was unfair that they could when they liked just wipe out pages of conversation..

Kacparov
[COMMENT DELETED]
nuclearturkey
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?

Kacparov
nuclearturkey wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?


So?

Kacparov
[COMMENT DELETED]
Lord-Chaos
[COMMENT DELETED]
Kacparov
[COMMENT DELETED]
Kacparov

like that

nuclearturkey
Kacparov wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?


So?


So?: meaning what difference does that make?

nuclearturkey
446919 wrote:
Kacparov wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?


So?


So If the founder hadn't founded the topic than that topic wouldn't have existed so technically the founder is the owner so the founder should be able to delete his/her topic at will


The founder doesn't "own" all the rest of the content in the thread actually..

rooperi
nuclearturkey wrote:
Kacparov wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?


So?


So?: meaning what difference does that make?


So, nobody but yourself has the right to delete comments you made, which involves time, effort, in some cases research, except yourself. The postwriter owns only the original post, it's not like he has intelectual property over the contribution of others.

Lord-Chaos

nuclearturkey don't get involved. shoo! away! bad dog! 446919 has kiddie mental issues. i think he's like 8 years old.

nuclearturkey
446919 wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
Kacparov wrote:
nuclearturkey wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


So?


So?


So?: meaning what difference does that make?


So? What difference does it not make?


It's up to you to prove your argument right, not me to prove it wrong. I don't see at all how being the founder automatically makes one the owner of all that follows their post..

nuclearturkey
Lord-Chaos wrote:

nuclearturkey don't get involved. shoo! away! bad dog! 446919 has kiddie mental issues. i think he's like 8 years old.


Well, I'll wait to find that out myself.. 

nuclearturkey
rich wrote:

{COMMENT EXPIERED}


I've never seen "comment expired" spelled wrong as a reason for a post disappearing before.. Undecided

nuclearturkey
tonydal wrote:
446919 wrote:

They may not be the owner, but they are the founder!


lol


Yes, perhaps just a "lol" May have been sufficient. Wink