13639 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I presume you are friends. Continue playing.
If you think this technique will increase their ratings reliably, then you don't understand the rating system.
On chess.com it does. I've seen members on here that have around my same blitz rating from playing only below 1600 players. Mine is from fighting 1700-2000 range players. If I did the same as these types, I'd easily have a 2000+ rating.
Statistically, you would suffer very rare defeats that would hurt your rating very much. You win 40 games, getting 1 point from each, then you lose one that costs you 40.
And yet again, players are exploiting the rating system just as I said. You have to understand that the chess.com elo system doesn't have floors like in the USCF. A player can mop on lower-rateds on here and gain more than they lose. It happens all the time, and I see players all the time with ratings in the 1800-2000 range, yet their average opponent rating is only 1550. You can't get around that fact.
I like the latter part of your quote, the 1550 part. Ha, ha, ha!!!!!!!!
Regardless of how it may or may not affect your ratings--why would you want to consistently play much lower rated players? This will hurt your efforts to improve your game.
Suspose that somehow it is true that you can increase your rating by playing much lower rated players and you do just that and get a higher rating? So what? You have not improved your actual chess ability. And eventually players who play against better competition will surpass you.
^ Looks like we got outselves a culprit in the house!
Magnus Carlsen: 2900
by Rosheen-Dove 6 minutes ago
Amusing Cheating Accusation
by XDave121X 7 minutes ago
Can intelligent person suck at chess, forever?
by adweithisdeadly 9 minutes ago
9/5/2015 - Ragozin - Bronstein, USSR Championship 1945, Modif
by Nanacc 16 minutes ago
*NEW* Report Spam here!
by ChessPatzer987 18 minutes ago
Quite a sort loser
by Rosheen-Dove 19 minutes ago
Predictions for the 2015 Chess World Cup
by Synaphai 23 minutes ago
The Perfect Game...?
by Lady-Knight 30 minutes ago
Another Chess Poem!
by Lady-Knight 51 minutes ago
Intentionally Aborted or Disconnected
by Slobbe 64 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!