8916 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
WellRounded
What is the name of the system used in game analysis that creates a +/- score?
Also what is the Highest/Lowest score possible? I ask because for the first time I saw a +33.15.
intp_mike
I think this is just referred to as the output of the particular engine's analysis function. It is just a numerical value produced by an algorithm that computationally weighs the pro's and con's of a position. As for the highest/lowest possible score, my guess (as a programmer myself) is that it varies from engine to engine. By the time the score is in the double digits, the game is basically decided anyways so a further positional advantage is just a step along the road to an inevitable win.
orangehonda
I always find it funny if it goes anything over 20.00 , I'm thinking, come on lazy engine, just find a mate already.
Considering you only start with 39 points of material, a +33.15 evaluation is pretty funny, it would be like having a rook and a pawn against the entire opponent army.
knightdropFTW
Legaly there is probably a way to promote to a bunch of queens each worth 9 points, so I can see it getting really high.
I got an evaluation of over 100.00 when I put this position into Rybka It's not even a legal position so it doesn't really count...
1...Nf6 2.Nd3 +- (99.07) Depth: 7 00:00:051...Nf6 2.Nd3 +- (100.75) Depth: 8 00:00:081...Nf6 2.Nd3 +- (101.19) Depth: 9 00:00:29
I'm thinking, come on lazy engine, just find a mate already.
This.
zxb995511
the highest is this: #1 (mate in one)
Right.
Highest Numerical Value.
blowerd
Surely a forced mate is possible from there even with best play from white.
By the way my response to this was King to c1 which the computer analysis described as a blunder.
Why does TT deduct points when I solve problem?
by AndyClifton a few minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by Cavatine a few minutes ago
A very detailed queen sacrifice opening Ver 2.0
by browni3141 a few minutes ago
Chess Player of the Month April 2012
by AndyClifton 3 minutes ago
Knight At Disadvantage But Wins the Match. (Even with Perfect Play From Black)
by ivandh 4 minutes ago
Who else with Average IQ sucks at Chess ( lol ) ?
by PatzerLars 7 minutes ago
Have your chess skills helped you in real life?
by nameno1had 8 minutes ago
Forum: Why blunders (and bad moves) lead you to lose
by AndyClifton 10 minutes ago
Mate in Five
by AndyClifton 13 minutes ago
I finally beat my dad at chess!
by ChiseledChessy 18 minutes ago