10744 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Is that even possible? When I first learned the rules I played for a week and was rated ~900. Do they lose on purpose or something?
Because they only score 33% against people rated 800.
How are you only 1300?
Nemo: Not everyone is as naturally gifted as you.
Is this K_Jr again?
I sincerely hope so. Will be blocked if it is !
I sincerely hope so.
Ratings are on a bell curve from around 100-ish to around 3000-ish. Each time someone wins a game and gets a better rating, the other guy loses and gets a lower rating. Seems pretty simple.
Well if you are interrupted during play incessantly you DROP in score.
If you start a game and need to rush to another task ...game abandonment you drop in score. However I really think that some players CANNOT ...are not euipped brain wise to handle chess moves. You must remember this is chess requires an enhanced RIGHT BRAIN hemisphere. If you have an enlarged RIGHT BRAIN you will be a good player. Some ambidextrous players who have EQUALLY enhanced RIGHT and LEFT brain hemispheres play better. Homosexuals actually have a wider corpus collosum connecting the 2 brains and you find these people are quite clever. JUST LIKE there are MATHS dummies and LANGUAGE dummies ...the same applies to chess. Greta Chess players are not better than PRIME MINISTERS or top athletes ...they only play chess with ease
It's a no-brainier.
K_Jr is actually way better than me, so no lol.
Not everybody has the talent that is needed to get over 1000 Elo. I mean SORRY BUT its often not their fault. YOU can imagine that not everybody wants to reach something in chess. And why ARE worrying about those players? Do you have AN argument why you are doing this, because it sounds like it is from an IDIOT...
p.s. Now read all the big marked words.
A person rated 600 can have just as much enjoyment playing another 600 as two 1600s.
But the OP question is silly. Sort of like asking why there are people on the other end of the bell curve "how are people rated 2800?"
Don't poke at us beginners. Not everyone has the time or desire to master chess.
That was pretty funny.
Haha good point!
Kaynight is not playing machines he is posting non stop in forums
JGambit: You must be too, to know this.
The immortal game II
by alexm2310 12 minutes ago
7/29/2014 - Full House
by Sandeepa_Dhananjaya 12 minutes ago
Cambridge Springs Transpositions...
by najdorf96 12 minutes ago
What is your favorite chess quote?
by ebillgo 21 minutes ago
by najdorf96 23 minutes ago
Kasparov for FIDE President?
by KingQueen64 25 minutes ago
Win against 1600+
by enemyofphilip 27 minutes ago
Statistics on Live page
by sajay 32 minutes ago
Isn't opening 1.e4 a sign of disrespect?
by The_Hazard 34 minutes ago
Post with a Tempo
by learningthemoves 46 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!